November 3, 2006
Kennedy versus Scott: Let's go to the Tape...
Take incumbency, a famous family name, and better hair out of the equation. Then, based on the arguments they make and the positions they present, decide which of these two gentlemen you would rather have representing you when it counts...
Who would Rev Ted Haggard vote for?
Who would Tom Delay vote for?
Who would Randy Cunningham vote for?
" " Bob Ney..............?
Ed Diprete...........?
there is not space for the whole list
Maybe if you wish really, really hard Scott won't lose by more then 30 points.
Posted by: Matt at November 4, 2006 8:19 AMlets face it, patrick would be a complete nothing if not for his last name
Posted by: johnpaycheck at November 4, 2006 11:41 AMPatrick cost himself my vote with his robocalls pimping for Mollis during the Dem primary season. I can tell you this: there are a lot of liberals disenchanted with him. If the Republicans run a pro-choice woman against him next time, they can take him.
Posted by: Rhody at November 5, 2006 1:46 AMHoly ---- ! How many times can someone say "Washington DC" in one sentance or "fight"?
Help me out here. Which one of these two has been in Congress for TWELVE years and which one has never been in office?
Patches looks like an eigth grader doing an oral report. Scott may by lose by twenty but we shoot ourselves in the foot for a seventh time if he does.
Posted by: DumpPatches at November 5, 2006 1:23 PM