March 8, 2007
Democrats Settling on an Iraq Plan
According to the Associated Press, House Democrats have decided where they will finally make their stand on the Iraq War…
House Democratic leaders intend to propose legislation requiring the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the fall of 2008, and even earlier if the Iraqi government fails to meet security and other goals, congressional officials said Wednesday night….The author of the story opines that this is finally the tough stand on Iraq that Democrats have promised…Democrats familiar with the emerging legislation said the bill would require President Bush to certify that the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki was making progress toward providing for his country's security, allocating its oil revenues and creating a fair system for amending its constitution….
The legislation also calls for the Pentagon to adhere to its standards for equipping and training U.S. troops sent overseas and for providing time at home between tours of combat.
At the same time, it permits Bush to issue waivers of these standards. Democrats described the waiver provision as an attempt to embarrass the president, but their effect would be to permit the administration to proceed with plans to deploy five additional combat brigades to the Baghdad area over the next few months.
The legislation is expected on the floor of the House later this month, and would mark the most direct challenge to date the new Democratic-controlled Congress has posed to the president's war policies. As such, it is likely to provoke a fierce response from the administration and its Republican allies in Congress.…but that’s just a bit of rah-rah partisan boosterism that somehow found its way into a news story. Since the President has publicly stated that he expects the Iraqi government to be responsible for security throughout all of Iraq by November of 2007, this legislation will have little impact on the President’s chosen course of action. Still, if some MSM make-believe about how Congressional Democrats have finally gotten tough is what it takes to get the Democratic leadership on board with trying to win the war in Iraq, then that's a net positive for the country.
remind me again why we bother sending people to washington to pass meaningless legislation?
is it so that the media will have something to spin? is it so that we can feel good knowing that our elected officials are at least trying?
how many weeks have we wasted on this pointless debate? if congress wants to do something about the war, then they should stand up and do it. and if they can't or won't, then they should pick up and move on to the countless other issues are staring us in the face.
Posted by: johnb at March 8, 2007 11:00 AM