Great post. Perfect storm is right.
Much to comment on but I cannot let the following pass:
"but some stem from factors beyond district control, McWalters said, such as high-cost special education"
Wrong. Twice as many students in Rhode Island have been diagnosed special ed as the national average. This was done deliberately and has played a significant role in the jump in school budgets.
Further, it's an open secret that this over-diagnosing was accomplished by "identifying" students who really were not special ed. So when local school districts look at where to adjust their budgets, they have a starting point.
If the Legislature wanted to help, they would mandate that special ed dollars in local school budgets cannot exceed the national average. Presumably this cannot be legislated as I understand local School Committees have the final say in how budget dollars are spent. But it can be controlled by adjusting the following year's state aid on the basis of the city/town's special ed funding in the prior year.
We've overfunded our public schools systems up to grade 12 and underfunded the state's post-secondary system.
The result? Smart kids graduating from RI's high schools go to quality out of state colleges and stay there. The smart ones that remain usually go to a private school like Brown or PC. And URI gets left in the dust.
What's amazing is that RI's educational expenses per student are so high, when so little of it goes to building new schools. RI's expense per pupil is far above the national average.
But in many other states, particularly those with increasing populations, a significant amount of the educational budget is spent on construction, land purchases and other items needed to support increasing student populations. RI doesn't have that problem.
In '04, RI spent $11,533 per pupil and the national average was $9,414 per pupil, about 18% more than the national average.
But when you remove capital outlays, RI spends $11,078 per pupil while the rest of the nation spends only $8,248 per pupil or about 26% more than the national average! RI spends more in virtually every administrative category except food services.
Yet RI's 4th and 8th graders' reading proficiency level is only average and our 4th and 8th graders' math proficiency levels are lower than the national average.
This is despite the fact that fewer RI students are economically disadvantaged than the national average (usually there is a link between educational achievement and economic status) and a greater percentage of RI students speak English than their national counterparts.
The only area in which RI students have a disadvantage versus the national average is that 6% more RI students have been diagnoses as "disabled", usually a codeword for special ed, which as SusanD points out, leads to more government funding.
These stats are from Standard & Poor's SchoolMatters and should disturb any RI parent or taxpayer.
" Twice as many students in Rhode Island have been diagnosed special ed as the national average. This was done deliberately and has played a significant role in the jump in school budgets."
"Further, it's an open secret that this over-diagnosing was accomplished by "identifying" students who really were not special ed. So when local school districts look at where to adjust their budgets, they have a starting point."
A lot of these kids come into the system already diagnosed as "special ed." Families receiving governmental assistance get more money for a child with a disability. The looting of the treasury is well thought out by those here to exploit the generosity of our programs. If there is a benefit to be had, there are thousands who know how to get it and social service employees who will tell those who don't how to get on the gravy train. The fact that inner city school systems have a higher percentage of special ed students is nothing more than the result of a segment of our society completely in tune with how to squeeze every nickel out of our system they can, without giving a penny back
RI would never have been allowed to over diagnose kids as learning disabled if it didn't benefit the teachers union. The benefit: more specialized teachers, multiple teachers in a single classroom, lower than necessary teacher to student ratio, more union dues. And to pay for it all we soaked the taxpayers and watched all the gifted student programs disappear.
If I ever hear something that seems genuinely positive about the teacher unions it will be the first time.
As I have said the answers are simple. Raise class sizes and trim benefits. Go to 401k's.
That's it. Otherwise, this is the real RI FUTURE:
Here is their general plan for the next 5 or so years according to a
well-known Pawtucket legislator who must remain nameless here.
1. Tiny raises for state workers; some attrition reductions. NO cuts
in pensions or other benefits. NO 401 K's.
2. Burn up all tobacco money till the market won't buy anymore bonds.
3. Raise sales tax to 8%
4. Raise capital gains tax to match Mass.
5. Flat tax will be frozen after this year.
6. "Some" welfare/medical/babysitter cuts.
7. The kicker-as a last resort-a statewide property tax to "provide an
education stream". It will start very small and with many exemptions.
However, it could then annualy be "adjusted" as needed. They are
already laying the ground by proposing a constitutional amendment to
guarantee "every child gets a quality education".
They are fully aware this will bring RI to the much coveted (LOL) gold
medal platform of taxes. They are banking on getting away with it if
done slowly and smoothly enough.
You heard it from me first. June 10,2007.
It's not the parents who are getting kids classified as special ed. They don't get benefits from it. It's the teachers and administrators.
Years ago, it was just thought that some kids were high energy. Now these same types of kids are diagnosed with ADD and medicated with drugs. The kids become less of a behavior problem for the teachers and the school department gets more money.
I don't mean to suggest that there aren't kids with legitimate ADD, but I do think it overdiagnosed. Teachers and administrators have a warped incentive to get kids classified as special ed under the existing system.
Click here for the new Anchor Rising & Ocean State Current page
About Community Crier
About Engaged Citizen
Administrator
You certainly can open all of the teacher contracts at the same time. It's no different than opening up a single district contract. The obstacle is that the teacher union has to agree to it. What's not realistic is opening any teacher contract in order to exact concessions, though it has happened.
Posted by: Frank at June 12, 2007 11:45 AMGreat post. Perfect storm is right.
Much to comment on but I cannot let the following pass:
"but some stem from factors beyond district control, McWalters said, such as high-cost special education"
Wrong. Twice as many students in Rhode Island have been diagnosed special ed as the national average. This was done deliberately and has played a significant role in the jump in school budgets.
Further, it's an open secret that this over-diagnosing was accomplished by "identifying" students who really were not special ed. So when local school districts look at where to adjust their budgets, they have a starting point.
If the Legislature wanted to help, they would mandate that special ed dollars in local school budgets cannot exceed the national average. Presumably this cannot be legislated as I understand local School Committees have the final say in how budget dollars are spent. But it can be controlled by adjusting the following year's state aid on the basis of the city/town's special ed funding in the prior year.
Posted by: SusanD at June 12, 2007 12:10 PMWe've overfunded our public schools systems up to grade 12 and underfunded the state's post-secondary system.
The result? Smart kids graduating from RI's high schools go to quality out of state colleges and stay there. The smart ones that remain usually go to a private school like Brown or PC. And URI gets left in the dust.
What's amazing is that RI's educational expenses per student are so high, when so little of it goes to building new schools. RI's expense per pupil is far above the national average.
But in many other states, particularly those with increasing populations, a significant amount of the educational budget is spent on construction, land purchases and other items needed to support increasing student populations. RI doesn't have that problem.
In '04, RI spent $11,533 per pupil and the national average was $9,414 per pupil, about 18% more than the national average.
But when you remove capital outlays, RI spends $11,078 per pupil while the rest of the nation spends only $8,248 per pupil or about 26% more than the national average! RI spends more in virtually every administrative category except food services.
Yet RI's 4th and 8th graders' reading proficiency level is only average and our 4th and 8th graders' math proficiency levels are lower than the national average.
This is despite the fact that fewer RI students are economically disadvantaged than the national average (usually there is a link between educational achievement and economic status) and a greater percentage of RI students speak English than their national counterparts.
The only area in which RI students have a disadvantage versus the national average is that 6% more RI students have been diagnoses as "disabled", usually a codeword for special ed, which as SusanD points out, leads to more government funding.
These stats are from Standard & Poor's SchoolMatters and should disturb any RI parent or taxpayer.
Posted by: Anthony at June 12, 2007 12:54 PMAnthony, Good info. Here's the link to SchoolMatters info for RI.
Posted by: Marc Comtois at June 12, 2007 1:20 PM" Twice as many students in Rhode Island have been diagnosed special ed as the national average. This was done deliberately and has played a significant role in the jump in school budgets."
"Further, it's an open secret that this over-diagnosing was accomplished by "identifying" students who really were not special ed. So when local school districts look at where to adjust their budgets, they have a starting point."
A lot of these kids come into the system already diagnosed as "special ed." Families receiving governmental assistance get more money for a child with a disability. The looting of the treasury is well thought out by those here to exploit the generosity of our programs. If there is a benefit to be had, there are thousands who know how to get it and social service employees who will tell those who don't how to get on the gravy train. The fact that inner city school systems have a higher percentage of special ed students is nothing more than the result of a segment of our society completely in tune with how to squeeze every nickel out of our system they can, without giving a penny back
Posted by: Michael at June 12, 2007 2:05 PMRI would never have been allowed to over diagnose kids as learning disabled if it didn't benefit the teachers union. The benefit: more specialized teachers, multiple teachers in a single classroom, lower than necessary teacher to student ratio, more union dues. And to pay for it all we soaked the taxpayers and watched all the gifted student programs disappear.
If I ever hear something that seems genuinely positive about the teacher unions it will be the first time.
Posted by: Frank at June 12, 2007 3:29 PMAs I have said the answers are simple. Raise class sizes and trim benefits. Go to 401k's.
That's it. Otherwise, this is the real RI FUTURE:
Here is their general plan for the next 5 or so years according to a
well-known Pawtucket legislator who must remain nameless here.
1. Tiny raises for state workers; some attrition reductions. NO cuts
in pensions or other benefits. NO 401 K's.
2. Burn up all tobacco money till the market won't buy anymore bonds.
3. Raise sales tax to 8%
4. Raise capital gains tax to match Mass.
5. Flat tax will be frozen after this year.
6. "Some" welfare/medical/babysitter cuts.
7. The kicker-as a last resort-a statewide property tax to "provide an
education stream". It will start very small and with many exemptions.
However, it could then annualy be "adjusted" as needed. They are
already laying the ground by proposing a constitutional amendment to
guarantee "every child gets a quality education".
Posted by: Mike at June 12, 2007 7:47 PMThey are fully aware this will bring RI to the much coveted (LOL) gold
medal platform of taxes. They are banking on getting away with it if
done slowly and smoothly enough.
You heard it from me first. June 10,2007.
It's not the parents who are getting kids classified as special ed. They don't get benefits from it. It's the teachers and administrators.
Years ago, it was just thought that some kids were high energy. Now these same types of kids are diagnosed with ADD and medicated with drugs. The kids become less of a behavior problem for the teachers and the school department gets more money.
I don't mean to suggest that there aren't kids with legitimate ADD, but I do think it overdiagnosed. Teachers and administrators have a warped incentive to get kids classified as special ed under the existing system.
Posted by: Anthony at June 13, 2007 1:50 AM