With his latest maneuver, Barack Obama has really clarified his approach to politics:
President Obama wants to cut the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term, mostly by scaling back Iraq war spending, raising taxes on the wealthiest and streamlining government, an administration official said Saturday as the president worked to finalize his first budget request.Obama's proposal for the 2010 fiscal year that begins Oct. 1 projects that the estimated $1.3 trillion deficit he has inherited from President Bush will be halved to $533 billion by 2013. That's a difference of 9.2% of the overall economy now vs. 3% in four years.
Hey, why not? Our national harbinger of hopey-change he of the impossible-to-gauge promise to "create or save" jobs (Can't you just hear the brainstorm team laughing at the gullible electorate while contriving that one?) learned from his election that Americans will believe whatever he says. Rather, we'll believe whatever we want about what he says, so one month into his presidency, Obama's day-to-day operations already resemble the most elaborately woven of Bill Clinton's state of the union speeches.
What better way to deflect political heat over the rush to move a massive spending bill through the legislative process than to insist that his goal is to decrease the deficit? "I'm a fiscal conservative," he's appearing to claim, "so you may go back to sleep and trust my steerage." Of course, for one thing, spending in Iraq was already likely to decrease, thanks to the success of the Bush Administrations reworked strategies. For another, the notion of "inheriting" his first budget year is a conspicuously convenient way to hide the impact of his own policies. But nevermind.
Make the claim; claim the ground; ground the flights of observation from the opposition. The administration will float excuses for failure, take the credit for others' successes, and find some way to straddle ever-broadening fences. After all: "He's gonna change it. And rearrange it. He's gonna change the world."
Justin
You can't be serious when you wrote this..
What better way to deflect political heat over the rush to move a massive spending bill through the legislative process than to insist that his goal is to decrease the deficit? "I'm a fiscal conservative," he's appearing to claim, "so you may go back to sleep and trust my steerage."
I'm sure you know that the stimulus bill passed both houses of Congress and our President signed it into law last week.
The fictitious quote you wrote makes no sense at all.
Justin,
Your post is either purposefully dishonest, or just sloppy.
You wrote: "Two underlying instances of audacity are that ... letting "the temporary Bush tax cuts expire in 2011 for people making more than $250,000 a year" won't affect the deficit in 2010. But nevermind."
Obama's plan to cut the deficit in half ends with the 2013 fiscal year budget, not the 2010 budget. Obama isn't claiming that the expiration of the tax cuts will impact 2010, so what's your point?
Hold on, I suppose I can answer that. Your point is to lob as many bombs as possible, regardless of target or subject.
I suppose we're just days from a post questioning Obama's nationality.
The only bomb was my hasty misreading; thank you for bringing it to my attention. I don't see that it affects my broader point, though.
Posted by: Justin Katz at February 23, 2009 5:20 PMOf course, the actual facts of Obama's plan have no impact whatsoever on your partisan sniping. Silly me.
Posted by: Pragmatist at February 24, 2009 9:07 AM