April 16, 2009
Providence, RI, Tax Day Tea Party Speech
This is one of those times in history when a society must make a decision. Social commentators of the near future will say one of two things about us: If we fail to be heard, then these tea parties, these expressions of outrage across the nation, are the final lunge of a fading culture, riddled with the errors of an unenlightened past. Or, if we can rein in our government, these demonstrations represent the reawakening of the American spirit, reasserting the principles of the United States.
Our country is defined by its principles. There is no picture of the typical American. We aren't a race. We aren't a religion. We aren't a tribe or a sect or a straight line of lineage. The typical American is a person in motion. With a swagger. Sometimes a smirk. Often a smile. But always, there's a set jaw and a confident stride toward the future toward growth and improvement and a better life for all who'll but seek it.
Future historians will either tell the tale of a nation that tipped the scales toward the final decline of Western civilization, or they will celebrate the character of a people who saved the world once again. Because it was right, and because it was who they were. Who we are.
We are called, most critically, not to stand against an external enemy although that exists but against a corruption of spirit. There is a cancer running through our culture that wants ease instead of opportunity, that takes a life of stability to be a higher goal than a life of achievement. Powerful interests will punish those who strive and excel because they want to be the ones providing everybody else's comfort defining everybody else's well-being.
We here today do not savor work, but freedom. If we aren't free to err and struggle, we aren't free to succeed. If we aren't free to build organizations and businesses and lives according to our beliefs and our goals, and based on our own experiences, then we just aren't free. There is no stability without risk, and freedom is the only defense against stagnation.
The forces of stagnation have waged a decades-long campaign to advance their cause incrementally. Little by little. While they hold sway in the halls of power they inject their principles of big government and nanny-state dictation into the body politic, and then, when the poison reveals itself in painful consequences, they recede into the shadows and await their next chance.
When a welfare and social policy regime results in a desperate underclass, these forces point to a bogeyman of bigotry. Conveniently, it's always to be found among their political opposition. When quasi-governmental lenders back unsecure investments and build an edifice of financial straw, would-be magicians of the political sphere spread our great-grandchildren's earnings around in order to establish the principle that government knows best how to run all things, large and small. They connive to foster dependency. They know that an antidote never fully overcomes addiction.
They take, and they tax. They regulate, and they assert authority. They preach their own superiority. And every year, they control a little bit more of our lives, telling a distracted citizenry that they are all that stands between our families and utter collapse and that only their guidance can protect us from our prejudices. They push the fallacy that an increasingly complicated society requires centralized oversight and central planning, when the polar opposite is true. Well, I'm sorry, Senators Reed and Whitehouse, Congressmen Langevin and Kennedy, but no matter how eloquent and genuinely intelligent our new president may be, even if he's the brightest bulb in that dim capital, his thinking is fundamentally flawed. It is dangerous. Oppressive.
If we cannot put a stop to the lapse in our national ideals currently seeping into Washington very similar to the illness that has ravaged Rhode Island we will cease to be the United States of America. If we cannot say to the president and his followers, "you lied you sold us a break, a period of cooperation," if we cannot say that and make the schemers in our government stop pasting a radical pastiche where they promised the even lines of a new realism, then they will have no fear. They will march right into our lives. They will know that the nice image of helping our old country to cross the road to a time of undefined hope and dubious change is suitable propaganda to cover their power grab.
I suspect that most of you here today now understand that there was never any intention to compromise. Those who rule our nation and who would rule the "global community" have an idea of compromise that is merely to mouth some pleasing words about listening and then to do whatever they want, take whatever they want. And that is why we must be uncompromising in our message. Enough is enough. That is the statement that the people of these United States have to make. That we have to make here today. And that we must continue to make as we turn our country back toward the right direction in the months and years to come.
Dear Justin,
I wanted to congratulate you on the above speech. I was able to hear it on Dan Yorke's show (live) and it was awesome. You hit all points succinctly.
Also, I would be interested in contributing to your blog. I believe I'm a fairly good writer (though I'm a physician) and have been in an e-mail war with Sheldon Whitehouse for six months now on healthcare issues. So, if you need more contributors, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Robert Hance, MD
Posted by: Robert Hance, MD at April 16, 2009 11:31 AMSaunderstown, RI
Bravo!
Posted by: michael at April 16, 2009 12:07 PMThanks for writing, presenting, and posting your speech.
* * *
For rhetorical impact alone, I think it is worth highlighting the following:
Those who rule our nation [...] have an idea of compromise that is merely to mouth some pleasing words about listening and then to do whatever they want, take whatever they want. And that is why we must be uncompromising in our message. Enough is enough.
That fits so much more than the fiscal mismanagement. So, so, so much more.
They will march right into our lives. They will know that the nice image of helping our old country to cross the road to a time of undefined hope and dubious change is suitable propaganda to cover their power grab.
I like how you put forth the example of RI as the potential future of the entire nation.
[N]o matter how eloquent and genuinely intelligent our new president may be, even if he's the brightest bulb in that dim capital, his thinking is fundamentally flawed. It is dangerous. Oppressive.
The new "new deal" emphasis on Obama's eloquence, such as it is, was never more substantive than an anti-GWB pose.
They take, and they tax. They regulate, and they assert authority. They preach their own superiority. And every year, they control a little bit more of our lives, telling a distracted citizenry that they are all that stands between our families and utter collapse and that only their guidance can protect us from our prejudices.
The incrementalism, the seeping, the theft by a million pick-pocketings, these have now given way to the brazen power grab.
They connive to foster dependency. They know that an antidote never fully overcomes addiction.
[W]hen the poison reveals itself in painful consequences, they recede into the shadows and await their next chance.
There is a cancer running through our culture that wants ease instead of opportunity, that takes a life of stability to be a higher goal than a life of achievement.
Their poison is not like chemotherapy. Far from it, of course, but they'd sell their cure-all tonic even when it fails to treat the symptoms, much less the underlying disease.
When the tonic fails, as it must, then radical and "emergency" surgery is their only solution. Remove the vital organs. More painkillers to numb the body politic.
Our country is defined by its principles. [...] The typical American is a person in motion. With a swagger. Sometimes a smirk. Often a smile. But always, there's a set jaw and a confident stride toward the future — toward growth and improvement and a better life for all who'll but seek it.
Yes. These principles are the vital organs. Living in the American spirit is not possible without these principles.
It takes a critical mass of the population living their lives instictinvely on the merit of these princples, in order for a culture to foster the enterepneural spirit, to secure liberty, and to innoculate against complacency.
I don't know the tipping point, but it probably is something like 3/4 of a population. Those who reach the highest levels of success don't do it alone.
The tide of aspiration lift all boats.
This part of your speech makes a good contrast to the "conniving to foster dependency" and addiction that is now on the political menu in Washington DC.
All it takes is a small share of drug-addled addicts in an urban neighborhood for that neighborhood to decline to the point of apparent return.
Feeding addiction hampers and undermines the rebuilding of critical mass within that neighborhood; and it undermines the sustainability of adjacent neighborhoods which over-compensate and are burdened with solutions for the wrong problems.
Justin, you'll notice that I've inverted these points from your speech.
Your statement makes sense coming and going, up and down, in forward and reverse.
Cheers,
Posted by: Chairm at April 16, 2009 4:09 PMChairm
typo correction: to the point of noapparent return.
Posted by: Chairm at April 16, 2009 4:15 PMGreat speech, Justin.
"Powerful interests will punish those who strive and excel because they want to be the ones providing everybody else's comfort — defining everybody else's well-being.
Sounds like the Walsh, Jerzyk, Crowley, Nee mission statement.
Posted by: George at April 16, 2009 6:39 PM