Print
Return to online version

June 11, 2009

Nothing Egregious About This Picket Line

Carroll Andrew Morse

I guess I'm to the left of Bob Kerr on this one. I agreed with him in 2007 (and thought he wrote the best single item on the subject) when he wrote that the Providence Firefighter's Local 799 threat to picket a statewide disaster drill, which could have shut down the drill, was wrong. I was glad when the union altered its plans and opted for an informational rally instead.

But the circumstances are different this time, for at least two reasons...

  1. A statewide disaster drill is fundamentally different from a mayor's conference. Stuff happens at a large-scale drill that cannot be simulated anywhere else. Had the drill not gone on, there's no guarantee that an adequate replacement could have been put together anytime soon after and the opportunity for coordinated training and learning would have been lost.

    A mayor's conference is no disaster drill. The main activity at a conference is talking and (hopefully) listening. While there is value in getting public officials to talk to one another face-to-face, they will have plenty of other chances to communicate with one another on issues they believe are important. Or, if you prefer a more colloquial expression of this idea, politicians will be able to find other opportunities to talk.

  2. Whatever I may think of the principle of union members respecting one another's picket lines, the fact is they do, and it was unfair of union leadership to potentially disrupt the drill by forcing firefighters to choose between their professional responsibilities and their union.

    However, Vice-President of the United States of America is not a union job. Vice-President Biden's decision not to attend the conference is a purely political one and it is ludicrous to assert that people should self-curtail their rights of free expression and assembly, because the VP of the US needs to be protected from having to make political decisions.


Comments

What in hell is your point? If an elected official crosses a picket line s/he has made a political decision and if an elected official refuses to cross a picket line s/he has made a political decision.
OldTimeLefty

Posted by: OldTimeLefty at June 11, 2009 11:56 AM

Whether Obama administration officials and others want to cross a picket line is their perogative.
But Cicilline's behavior is that of a classic fugazy (pseudo tough guy). Little Chi Chi (TM Phillippe & Jorge), by resorting to designated picket areas and licensing, has blown this all up way out of proportion. AFAIC, he's done a lot more to embarass the city this week than the firefighters have.

Posted by: rhody at June 11, 2009 3:52 PM

Cicilline lacks credibility in the area of saving taxpayers' money when he appoints a Director of Protocol(??);has John Simmons paid on the QT by an anonymous donor;hires a "stimulus lobbyist" for $135K a year;gives a police chief a contract worth $250K per year,and gives a $38K raise to fire chief in a 2 year period.
Let's not even mention spending $200K to investigate a bounced check for less than a third of that amount.
He could've asked his brother on visiting day for a few gallons of gas.
Okay,I know that sounds crazy,but what he did was pretty crazy too.

Posted by: joe bernstein at June 14, 2009 7:31 AM

Fugazy means anything fake or phony in NY street lingo.
The funny thing is that the biggest limousine company is,or was named Fugazy(i?)and I think they had a big Cadillac dealership also.As far as I know they were a normal company and the term probably has no connection to them.
Tere was a famous Italian businessman named Fugazi in NYC in the early 20th century.
Make notes Rhody,there will be a surprise written quiz.

Posted by: joe bernstein at June 14, 2009 8:13 AM