The important thing to remember is that prostitution is a matter of individual choice and freedom. Right?
Although the atmosphere [at Cheaters] is often chaotic, Ruth said that the pimps had a very strict "system" of unwritten rules that the girls have to follow. For example, new girls have to be careful not to sleep with other girls' pimps.Many of the women are branded with the pimp's mark. Ruth said the women have tattoos which "dubbed them as prostitutes." Their tattoos depict different sexual acts or positions, literally creating "advertising on their bodies." Service providers in other states say that up to 80 percent of girls controlled by pimps are tattooed or branded with marks of ownership, according to Donna Hughes, professor at the University of Rhode Island.
When new girls arrived at Cheaters, Ruth characterized them as "vulnerable, young, and with no other options." Many of the women have a troubled past which create emotional and substance abuse problems. Ruth said the dancers "almost never get on stage sober. While they get dressed, they snort a line of coke together."
The pimps prey on the young women's vulnerabilities. The girls are tightly bonded to their pimps, who they call their "daddies." Ruth said "their 'daddies' may be the only ones who pay attention to them and they convince themselves that the pimps care about them." Some of the women say they have a "nice pimp," which Ruth says is an oxymoron.
On further thought, this might be just the sort of business that the Rhode Island government ought to target as a profit center. Who could doubt that most members of the General Assembly would prove to be "nice pimps"?
Actually, those 'nice pimp's in the GA already have close to a 400K little 'nice hookers' called voters.
We might have misunderstood their reluctance to rid the state of indoor prostitution then as we, the 'nice hookers' all live indoors...even if it's at Camp Runamock.
Posted by: Roland at August 9, 2009 3:35 PMI have no doubts about the relationship between the hookers and the pimps, it is just another expression of the "Stockholm Syndrome".
The "branding" does arouse my cynicism; although I am sure it happens, particularly with the popularity of ink. Still, it has that air of urban myth about it.
Posted by: Warrington Faust at August 9, 2009 10:44 PMIt shouldn't be a shock that some people make terrible choices for themselves. However, as long as they aren't actually harming anyone other than themselves, those are still their choices to make. We're fooling ourselves if we think that big government coming in with more regulations, committees, laws, agencies, bureaucrats, police officers, fines, trials, and incarcerations will solve the problem. Of course, if all of the transactions involved are truly voluntary, then it's a leap to call it a "problem" in the first place. Unless one believes that he or she has the right not to be offended, or the right to make personal choices for others. Dangerous territory.
Posted by: Dan at August 10, 2009 9:48 AM