The GA are spinless cowards. If they eliminated these unfunded mandates, alot of the problem would be solved. These mandates just create jobs for more union cronies. They do little to nothing, except cost us. Cities and towns are on their own. The state is sinking them with their inaction.

Does the Commissioner have the authority to revoke a Superintendent's certification?

Since certification is issued by the Regents, my guess is that she does not.

Is it appropriate for her to threaten a superintendent with personal de-certification based on a school committee's decision not to comply with a mandate from RIDE?

I think not, and I question the prudence and propriety of making such a threat.

Ms. Gist ought bone up on a few other laws / requirements before she opines on critical matters from on high, such as:

Woonsocket's City Charter:
Sec. 7. Exceeding appropriations prohibited.
No department or agency, including the school department, shall expend or contract to expend any money or incur any liability or enter into any contract which by its terms involves expenditures of money during the fiscal year in excess of the amounts appropriated

Rhode Island General Laws:
§ 16-9-1 ...school expenditures, encumbrances, and accruals shall not, in any fiscal year, exceed the total revenue appropriated for public schools in the town. Should the town treasurer, finance director, or other charter officer charged with general responsibility for town finances, or the school financial officer, estimate that actual public school expenditures, encumbrances, and accruals may exceed the total revenue appropriated for the expenditures in any fiscal year, the school committee, the superintendent of schools, and the chief elected officials of the town shall be notified. Purchase orders or financial commitments shall not be authorized even on the order of the school committee unless it can be proven that there will not be an excess of expenditures, encumbrances, and accruals over revenues.

§ 16-2-9 General powers and duties of school committees
The school committee of each school district shall be responsible for maintaining a school budget which does not result in a debt.

RIGL 44-5-2 (S-3050):
… budget adopted and presented by any school committee for the fiscal year 2010 shall not propose the appropriation of municipal funds (exclusive of state and federal aid) in excess of one hundred four and three-quarters percent (104.75%) of the total of municipal funds appropriated by the city or town council for school purposes for fiscal year 2009;

The growth in property tax levies should be capped in accordance with section 44-5-2 of the general laws to five and one-half percent (5.5%) annual growth as a quid pro quo for receiving increased state aid to reduce reliance on the property tax.

(7) Cities and towns should be assisted in their efforts to control school and municipal expenditures by appropriately amending state arbitration and school budgeting laws.

Lastly, perhaps if Mr. Dubois didn't give away the store to the Woonsocket Teachers' Union, he be able to afford some of the unfunded mandates. All of his Union-hack teachers are receiving salary increases this fiscal year, despite the state hemoraging unemployment. He also has several hundred Union hack teachers that don't pay one red cent for Healthcare.

Indeed, as Mr. Dubois himself is a 40-something year-old Retired police officer who receives FREE lifetime Healthcare and a Pension that grows by 3% every year, one can not expect him to be able to credibly demand the necessary adjustments / reforms to the Union-hack contract.

That being said, some things are worth fighting for. It is time to steal a page from Patrick "I struggle mightly with basic math" Crowley's book and wave the middle finger as Ms. Gist.

GeorgeE, to be exact, the number of teachers in Woonsocket who pay nothing towards healthcare (isn't that quaint?!) is seventy four.

Beyond that, you make an excellent point that the Woonsocket School Committee is breaking a number of important laws beyond those cited by Ms. Gist. These include a failure to adhere to a budget and a refusal to recognize the authority of the Woonsocket City Council to set the amount of the education budget.

Monique,

I may be wrong, but I believe the number of individuals NOT paying for healthcare going into this year's budget is 170+, not 74. Regardless of the number, just ONE non-paying member is too many.

And for those that do pay, the contribution is a mere 15%.

It would have been nice if Mr. Dubois & Co. took as agressive a stand with the Teachers' Union (as they are with mandates) rather than ignoring the Free (and near free) Healthcare issue and providing Salary increases for all employees (is anyone else getting salary increases in this economy?).

But then again, when your living on the Tit as Mr. Dubois is, it's hard to ask others not to.

Note that officials from Cranston and North Smithfield were quoted as saying they are closely monitoring this situation. Unfunded mandates have been a hot button for a long time but now during the worst economic downturn since the depression the state raises spending by 13% and lowers local and school aid raising the burden on homeowners who will foot the bill.

This could turn into a general revolt or a class action that finally gets a school funding formula. The smaller communities are getting the screws from the Providence's of the world.

Doughboys,

A "fair funding formula" (fair to whom?) is just another crutch and diversion for elected officials to use while not addressing the real issue, which is the Unsustainable spending tied to Union-hack contracts.

Let's have Collective-bargaining reform, REAL Pension reform and a right-to-work state before we fiddle with how to "fund" the Unsustainable spending.

For example, let's legislate that anyone receiving taxpayer funded employment related healthcare must pay at least 25% of the cost. We legislate the Minimum Wage (we don't leave that to collective bargaining). We can certainly legislate the Minimum that someone must pay for Taxpayer funded employment related healthcare benefits.

Let's outright repeal the collective "bargaining" laws that allow public employees to "negotiate" pay & benefits. They can negotiate working conditions only. Pay & benefits should be left to the free market.

Fix those things first, then you can play with how the funding is handled.

Just remember, the Unions love it when you all have arguments over State Aid and Fair Funding, as it distracts taxpayers from focusing on the Union-hack contracts that are bankrupting every city & town, including the state.

This issue is similar to NEA-RI's Bob Walsh floating the screwball idea of monetizing dwindling gambling revenue to fund the Unsustainable Pensions.

Rather than focus on and address the Unsustainable benefits being doled out, ole Bobby tried to change the discussion to screwball ways to fund the status quo.

The "progressives" (actually neo-fascists) concept of a funding formula is to emulate the "progressive income tax" (no pun intended) but based upon geography rather than income.

So "rich" communities in the suburbs would pay higer property taxes, but get less state aid than "needy" (urban) communities.

In other words, another redistribution of wealth.

The only truly fair and effective funding formula would be a per capita voucher for each child, which follows the child to whatever type of school their parent deems best for their child: traditional "public," charter, mayoral academy or private.

You have to remember, though, most R.I. municipalities don't have the Dem Good Old Boys on Smith Hill rolling over for them the way Sue Menard does.
Maybe I wouldn't be hit with a tax increase if Charlie Lombardi got a makeover and new pumps.

Hey, Rhody, how's this for a title.

"Motorcycles, Manolos and Malfeasance: The Political Life and Times of S. Menard"