Print
Return to online version

May 11, 2010

Where the West Is Going

Justin Katz

It's a much broader topic than I've time to explore, just now, to say why I see these apparently small-scale local battles to be along the same line as global events, but by way of checking in on the state of Western civilization, here's Mark Steyn:

A while back, Wilders was asked what his party would do in its first days in office after winning the election (to be held later this year). He replied that it would pass a bill ending "non-western immigration" to the Netherlands. This remark is now one of the "crimes" listed on the indictment against him. So the Dutch state is explicitly prosecuting the political platform of the most popular opposition party in the country. Which is the sort of thing we used to associate with your average banana-republic caudillo rather than free societies.

Regulation of speech — regulation in general — is shaping up to be the method by which unaccountable bureaucrats gain power over the elected representatives who are actually supposed to run the show. To oversimplify the resulting situation: Those bureaucrats benefit when the society sees itself as weak and in need of stable, government control, but in any sense related to authority and resolve, the bureaucrats, themselves, are weak and will ultimately be displaced by those who do not share the good intentions that they attribute to themselves.

Comments

"method by which unaccountable bureaucrats gain power over the elected representatives who are actually supposed to run the show."

This what I fear when I hear talk of "term limits". I suspect that this will lead to the mandarinization of our government. where long standing, experienced, bureaucrats will control the inexperienced "elected". This will come about simply because the bureaucrats will "know what to do".

I see this in my local Planning Board, where the elected members regularly defer to the "appointed" Planning Agent. After all he is the experienced "professional", and they are new comers to the game with good intentions, but no experience. I have no idea how far he would have to go, before they were willing to stand up to him and say "enough". Presently, they simply vote as he directs them.

Posted by: Warrington Faust at May 12, 2010 1:31 AM

You may want to correct that last and long rambling sentence:
"the bureaucrats, themselves, are weak and will be displaced who do not share the good intentions that they attribute to themselves."

Posted by: Stuart at May 12, 2010 9:00 AM