June 2, 2010
One Degree of Disconnect, Part Two
I previously commented on the one degree of disconnect that I've come to believe is the core political problem in our state. The event that motivated that post was an immigration reform-related bill that was brought up in the RI House (kinda). Now, as Andrew and Monique have explained, the same shenanigans--again related to an immigration reform-related bill--have gone on in the Senate. And the problem is the same, but this event has pulled back the curtain even more.
This time it was the Senate President, Theresa Paiva Weed, with the help of Majority Leader Danel Connors, who killed the vote on E-verify. As I explained before, it's only a single degree of disconnect between the average RI voter and the Senate President or Speaker of the House. That "degree" is our local Senator or Representative, who we may think of as a good guy or gal and can't bring ourselves to punish for the actions of their leaders. Even though they selected them in the first place.
As Andrew pointed out, there are avenues that Democrats could have used to call the leadership on the procedural shenanigans on display last night. It took political courage to do it--which some of the Democrats appear to have--but in this case it also took some acumen to realize what was going on. They didn't: apparently (as brought to light on the Dan Yorke Show) Sen. Marc Cote was led down the procedural primrose path by Paiva Weed herself. Now we have another instance of a Democratically elected leader, Senator Paiva Weed, exercising unilateral power to quash a bill that had strong support publicly and within the Legislature.
So what happens now? Will the Democrat Senators take this into account when judging whether or not to select Paiva Weed as their leader next session? Will voters take this into account before voting to re-elect those who continue to enable this type of "leadership"?
"Will voters take this into account before voting to re-elect those who continue to enable this type of "leadership"?"
Yes, they will. She has shown leadership on behalf of her constituents. Hers are the restaurant and other business owners who hire the people who'd be affected by e-verify.
Posted by: Patrick at June 2, 2010 2:25 PM>>Yes, they will. She has shown leadership on behalf of her constituents. Hers are the restaurant and other business owners who hire the people who'd be affected by e-verify.
Not to mention the Poverty Industry that is even more dependent upon illegal aliens (and their anchor babies) for its continued "viability."
Rhode Island is sooooo screwed!
Posted by: Ragin' Rhode Islander at June 2, 2010 3:15 PMPatrick, It almost goes without saying the Paiva Weed will be re-elected by her constituents, the "those who continue to enable this type of 'leadership'" that I'm talking about are the Democratic Senators in not-quite-as-safe districts (there must be a few, right?) who keep selecting Paiva Weed to run things. Is there any chance they'll get voted out because of the actions of their leader? Yeah, I've got my doubts, too.
Posted by: Marc at June 2, 2010 4:06 PMRhode Island is sooooo screwed!
Posted by Ragin' Rhode Islander at June 2, 2010 3:15 PM
Ya think?
LOL.
"Will voters take this into account before voting to re-elect those who continue to enable this type of "leadership"?"
Posted by: Tommy Cranston at June 2, 2010 7:10 PMWell, progressive Democrats have won every single GA election since 1934.
Who's the smart money on?
This state deserves EVERYTHING it gets.
Thank goodness I am leaving this corrupt hellhole of a state. At this point I would again like to recommend the Free State Project to anyone interested in seeing limited government and liberty in their lifetime.
Posted by: Dan at June 2, 2010 8:28 PM