Click here for the new Anchor Rising & Ocean State Current page
April 6, 2011
Wisconsin Watch Cont'd
Continuation of this post.
[10:40] According to the AP results, 10 of the 12 remaining Milwaukee precincts have come in along with the 8 previously outstanding precincts from Ashland County. Prosser still leads, now by less than 400 votes. One outstanding precinct from Dane County (73-23 Kloppenburg), one from Jefferson County (58-42 Prosser), and six from Sauk County (55-45 Kloppenburg) are potential sources of big swings in a 400-vote margin.
[10:45] Kloppenburg now up, by 140 votes, mostly as the result of Sauk County's remaining precincts. Now the question is whether the remaining Jefferson precinct gives Prosser a margin over Kloppenburg that is 140 votes greater than the remaining Democratic leaning precincts, including 2 from Milwaukee and 1 from Dane (Madison).
[10:55] In one of those the county-level changes while the totals don't occurances that happen from time to time , Dane county now shows all in, with Kloppenburg's lead holding at 140.
[10:59] Kloppenburg now up by over 350. The Jefferson County precinct that is outstanding has to have a large population that breaks big for Prosser for him to retake the lead, plus 2 Milwaukee County precincts are still out. (Note: I don't know how absentee ballots factor into the results at this point)
[2:30] With one precinct left to report, Kloppenburg is up by 206 votes. The one precinct is in Jefferson County, so I'd expect that number to tighten, but something along the lines of a 70-30 Prosser majority from a large precinct would be needed to flip the result.
About Community Crier
About Engaged Citizen
Administrator
And now the stories of vote fraud are coming to light. Poll workers caught destroying ballots, demanding photo ID of absentee voters, registering young voters who vote on the spot and then re-register.
There is no limit to the depth of the Left's corruption. What more flagrant way to express their contempt for the Constitution than their sytematic vote fraud?
punditpress.blogspot.com/2011/04/evidence-of-wisconsin-voter-fraud.html
Posted by: BobN at April 7, 2011 10:25 AMWhenever a close vote doesn't go our way, we cry voter fraud.
Posted by: bella at April 7, 2011 12:09 PMYawn.
Bella must be too young to remember 2000.
Whenever voter fraud succeeds, the Left says it isn't a real issue.
BS.
Posted by: BobN at April 7, 2011 12:44 PMBob, Google "Brooks Brothers riot."
Posted by: bella at April 7, 2011 3:25 PMWho created the mob scene?
Enough Prosser votes have already been found, in the initial stages of the recount, to flip the result.
www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/119410124.html
Here we go...
Posted by: Andrew at April 7, 2011 4:24 PMCheck my comment above. Wisconsin is still in the process of finishing its "first count", and the discrepancy is between the AP's reported totals, and the canvassers' official total.
Posted by: Andrew at April 7, 2011 4:30 PMProsser will win now. HA ha.
Posted by: Bobbbb at April 7, 2011 6:43 PMThe unions went "all in" on this and could barely muster a draw!