Centralized govt's full of politicians who have never had to make a payroll,take a risk,hire,fire,market,etc. are a disfunctional entity in the way of business success. Entrepreneurs are the backbone of this country. RI's pols have cast the die resulting in the state being the largest employer rife with public unions and unfunded mandates (see pensions). Will the state's pols ever learn? The future hangs in the balance.

Biotech is a 200+ billion dollar industry. But, oh, why, why doesn't the state focus on more mini-golf?!

"The best strategy is simply to get government out of the way."

Hilarious! Isn't that what Vitagliano is complaining about? "No one knows we're here."

btw, Ms. Vitagliano (if you're out there), why not consider Providence? We'd love to have you here.
www.opportunityprovidence.com/supporting-your-business

We really can't fault Russ for his ignorant comments. The Projo did a real poor job in exploring what she was trying to say. Then again, I don't recall her asking for a handout either so what was your point Russ?

Ms. Christina Vitagliano isn't lining the pockets of the politicians with campaign donations.

Good for her!

"We really can't fault Russ for his ignorant comments."

More personal attacks from the local thugs, eh? What a shock. How many start-ups have you run, Max?

"Then again, I don't recall her asking for a handout either so what was your point Russ?"

Well, at least I actually read the article. Here's the full quote:

“No one knows we’re here,” Vitagliano said. “I’m not a pharma company, I’m not a medical-device company, I’m not Curt Schilling. There has been zero help from anyone.”

I wouldn't call that necessarily "asking for a handout," but I wouldn't call what most knowledge district firms need a handout either.

One mistake above... I forgot that Ms. Vitagliano's company actually is headquartered in Providence (I was thinking of the storefronts). But Providence has help for those who ask.
www.opportunityprovidence.com/supporting-your-business/business-liaison

I wonder if she's reached out?

Too bad Justin wasn't against running the state like a business when the last guy promised to do just that!
www.projo.com/news/content/governor_12-26-10_PELLKK1_v1.2d56b8a.html

“I sense a freshness in the air,” said the retired Cookson America CEO, who came into office promising to make the state run more like a business, usher in 20,000 new jobs, and fix the public schools.

Isn't that what they all say Russ? Of all the governors in the last couple of decades he probably came the closest to running it like a CEO. There's a philosophical difference between how a career politician thinks a business should be run and an actual CEO. Carceiri wasn't the nicest guy and he certainly stumbled a couple of times but I'll give him credit for trying to cut the state budget and address the pension crisis in bad times. Don't mistake that for an endorsement of his tactics but he went after it up against a resistant GA.

Funny thing is, economic development is one of the areas I (and other progressives) supported Carcieri, who was a big proponent of the knowledge district. I had opportunity to speak with Saul Kaplan a number of times and thought he was unfairly blamed for job losses outside of his control.

rifuture.org/saul-kaplan-resigns-from-edc.html

"... he certainly stumbled a couple of times but I'll give him credit for trying to cut the state budget and address the pension crisis in bad times."

Agree, in spades.

What legitimate business would be self-destructive enough to open its doors in Rhode Island when there are low-tax, uncorrupt states with right-to-work laws available? Even the recipients of all these corrupt loans, grants, and tax breaks Russ loves should be hesitant to tie the financial future of their company to the arbitrary whims and fads of highly questionable state politicians. Most people don't work in "knowledge jobs," whatever the heck that even means. Elitist nonsense from the central planners that will lose out every time to fair and open tax and labor policies in business-friendly states.

Dan, good to see you getting some overtime.

David - I don't understand your comment. Is it supposed to be funny?

P.S. Overtime pay is not available to me, unlike many RI government workers. Although my job does often require extra hours.

poor dan aka db... I quess you do understand. Right to work and right to complain. You do both in abundance. Oh, and know a lot too. Don't step on Joe.s toes though. In the know it all category.

db? I don't know who you think I am, but those aren't my initials.

Why don't you stop speaking nonsense and say what you mean?

Your overtime comment still makes no sense.

So very Rhode Island... people with single-name nicknames arguing with each other over who is and who isn't someone in real life.

Funny thing, I let everyone on here know exactly who I was when I was volunteering for the Chafee campaign in 2009-2010, and no one came to my house and tried to kill me, lol.

So really, either:
A) Stop caring about who people are in RL, or
B) Stop posting on an online Internet blog which allows for anonymity if it bothers you so.

But trying to guess / attack the person IRL? Bad form David S. And I sure as heck hope you aren't who I think YOU are, given the db initials you tossed ;)

If so, when I get back to RI (if ever?), you're getting tossed in the river. No joke.

I've said it before - basically I have no problem with sharing personal information, but I use only my first name on here because I fear retaliation from the RI unions, particularly NEARI. I know at least two of their leaders have been arrested for harassing criminal behavior in the past, and I have witnessed them attempt to get conservative-libertarian individuals fired from their jobs through RIFuture. My family and my employer don't deserve to be harassed for my political views.

In your case Dan, remaining anonymous makes a great deal of sense to me. Just to clarify though: I was saying that David S. shouldn't care who you are IRL, or that he should give up on blogs.

It's completely your choice to remain anonymous, which if you are in a position of power, I actually respect even more than using your real name (which could gain you things, as well as the losses you mentioned).

No one should be harassed for what they say online, as long as it isn't blatantly slanderous or inciting/condoning violent action. That's my view at least.

jparis-it's each person's choice to post under their name or not.
Since I'm retired I don't care if people know my name or not,and if I do make an ad hominem attack,I want to take responsibility for it.
I've had many made at me here and on other blogs and it's no big deal.
I can't believe some of the utter sh*t I see on Facebook where people have bitter feuds.
They should get a life.
I got into it here with one "Rhody"because that A hole made "factual"allegations about me which were outright lies-a lot different from trashing my point of view,which is part and parcel of blogs.
Same with "Stuart"and "triplechard",whom I think are the same person.
I do believe there are people at the NEA who go outside the boundaries of decency and even legality to harrass those who oppose them.

If so, when I get back to RI (if ever?), you're getting tossed in the river. No joke.
Posted by jparis at October 13, 2011 11:07 AM

Care to explain? No joke? I don't get this.