I think it's important to look at substance when the legislators say something that looks good. Which bills are they going to address early? If, as I think I saw somewhere, the ones on the fast track are requests from administrative departments, there's little political advantage to holding them, and likely to be little controversy.

Similarly, when Paiva-Weed talks about improving the business climate, she appears to mean a narrow effort to lighten the registration process. They're all trying to seem like they're addressing problems in a good-government way while continuing business as usual.

You can't both address the municipal pension time bomb and "steer clear of upsetting public safety unions".
It's one or the other.
Maybe another November pension session is the answer.

"Wait, what? Did I miss something? Did I miss where Rhode Island's unemployment rate was magically fixed?"

Ha! How many times did I read over here the (nonsensical) statement that government cannot create jobs? Who can even remember what you guys believe over here anymore? I'm sure if the GA had a jobs program on the agenda you'd be all for it. Hahaha!

Ok Russ, now I agree with the others, you're just malicious in how you misrepresent what others wrote. I specifically wrote about this issue:

"Build an environment in Rhode Island that promotes job creation. "

I specifically did NOT say for the Assembly to create jobs. Even the portion that you quoted does not indicate that I expect the Assembly to create jobs. I expect them to do something to lower the unemployment rate. Something like create an environment for businesses (maybe even for shellfishing!) to survive, thrive and hire people in this state.

How much would it cost to bus the entire General Assemby over to low-tax, small-government, libertarian New Hampshire for an inservice session explaining how a small New England state 1-hour away from Rhode Island can have half its unemployment rate and a 30% higher average household income.

"Ha! How many times did I read over here the (nonsensical) statement that government cannot create jobs? Who can even remember what you guys believe over here anymore? I'm sure if the GA had a jobs program on the agenda you'd be all for it. Hahaha!"

Poor Russ with another lame ass comment designed to obfuscate the fact that left wing policies have set Rhode Island on a spiral up the unemployment ladder. Russ is happy for the status quo. The expansion of the left wing voter base is dependent on how many more they can push into poverty. No one here is looking for a jobs bill except you Russ. We just want a better business climate but thanks for stopping in and puking on your shoes.

"left wing policies have set Rhode Island on a spiral up the unemployment ladder."

Indeed. But it can be turned around, both politically (with the presence of two vibrant political parties in the General Assembly) and legislatively.

However, the latter will take more than lip service. Accordingly, I sincerely hope Justin is mistaken on this point:

" when Paiva-Weed talks about improving the business climate, she appears to mean a narrow effort to lighten the registration process."

If you had any specifics, you might be surprised who would agree with you. For instance, I've been fairly critical of the GA for cuts to early stage venture funding initiatives that were advocated by Carcieri. With the site down, you'll have to take my word for it.

www.rifuture.org/funding-cuts-impact-ri-techscience-ranking-.html

Unfortunately the GOP ideas I've seen lack specifics or smack of tax cuts mascarading as a job creation plan.

www.golocalprov.com/news/20265/

We are currently rated the worst place to run a business and have the 3rd highest unemployment rate in the country,” Sweeney said. “We need to alleviate regulations on small business owners and incentivize them to hire new employees."

"Incentivize them to hire new employees?" Come on. That's not a plan. As for regulations, the devil is is the details.

"If you had any specifics, you might be surprised who would agree with you. For instance, I've been fairly critical of the GA for cuts to early stage venture funding initiatives that were advocated by Carcieri."

I see. So if a Republican administration advocates for something, that must mean that it is consistent with small government and everyone here agrees with it. This may shock you, Russ, but a lot of the people here aren't huge fans of Bush or Carcieri.

Your example indicates nothing about open-mindedness on your part. All it illustrates is that you can cherrypick certain interventionist policies you agree with from politicians who happen to be conservative in other areas.

Still waiting to here from Russ, Phil, and all the other progressive-types here why they think Rhode Island is so much worse off than states like New Hampshire. Usually the "why" is an important first step before trying to implement various top-down solutions, but in this case I can see why it is convenient to avoid that elephant in the room. Let me guess, "the corporations", etc.

Dan, don't be stupid. Corporations? Sheesh, no. It's because of eight years of Don Carcieri. In spite of the General Assembly trying for all eight years to thwart the massive power of the Governor's seat, they were unable to and Carcieri was able to ram through every single budget and every single bill that he and the rest of his right-wing cronies at the State House wanted in place.

Isn't it obvious?

Actually, I might have said NAFTA (listen to Rep. Paul on this one some time). Since you folks love corporations so much I know you must be big fans.

Me, I don't doubt some here didn't like Bush. Libertarians certainly shouldn't have if they are actually libertarians. As for Carcieri, just pointing out an example of where progressives like me differed with the supposedly "left-wing" GA and where I was in agreement with many non-progressives.

So Rhode Island lags behind New Hampshire due to NAFTA. I have to admit, I've heard some whacky narratives from progressives, Russ, but that's a new one. A+ for creativity.

"Dan, don't be stupid. Corporations? Sheesh, no. It's because of eight years of Don Carcieri. In spite of the General Assembly trying for all eight years to thwart the massive power of the Governor's seat, they were unable to and Carcieri was able to ram through every single budget and every single bill that he and the rest of his right-wing cronies at the State House wanted in place.

Isn't it obvious?"

...and he hired his niece sending a crushing blow to the economy across the state. Oh the gall of that man!!!