Bill to Allow State Employees Serve in Assembly, by Patrick Laverty
Rhode Island Politics
2:39 PM, 03/12/12
Bill to Allow State Employees Serve in Assembly, by Patrick Laverty
Rhode Island Politics
2:39 PM, 03/12/12
Coming up in Committee: Sixteen Sets of Bills Scheduled to be Heard by the RI General Assembly, March 13 - March 15, Part 2, by Carroll Andrew Morse
General Assembly
9:30 AM, 03/12/12
Held For Further Study, or We Were Told Not To Vote On This, by Patrick Laverty
Rhode Island Politics
9:00 AM, 03/12/12
Coming up in Committee: Sixteen Sets of Bills Scheduled to be Heard by the RI General Assembly, March 13 - March 15, Part 1, by Carroll Andrew Morse
General Assembly
8:00 AM, 03/12/12
The Current Week, 03/05/12-03/10/12, by Justin Katz
Promotions
6:41 AM, 03/12/12
A Hint As To What Will Trigger State Intervention?, by Monique Chartier
Woonsocket
7:05 PM, 03/10/12
RISCing the Press Table, by Justin Katz
Self-Government
3:22 PM, 03/10/12
Tassoni: Pets Need Court Advocates, by Monique Chartier
On a Lighter Note...
3:00 PM, 03/10/12
RISC Panel Discussion on Municipal Finance, by Carroll Andrew Morse
Self-Government
9:15 AM, 03/10/12
March 12, 2012
Bill to Allow State Employees Serve in Assembly
How's this sound on the face of it? A bill sponsored by Senators Jabour, Crowley and Pinga would remove the restriction that prevents state employees from running for election for a state seat. So a state employee could run for the General Assembly or any of the other General Officer seats. It sure sounds like a conflict of interest, doesn't it? In face, according to boston.com, the restriction was put in place in 1939 to eliminate at least this possible conflict of interest. I guess "only in Rhode Island" would the politicians look to add more conflicts of interest.
One can see the point though, why should anyone be restricted simply due to their place of employment? We already have other potential conflicts at the State House. How many lawyers vote on bills that can affect them? How many others are members of unions in the state and bring forth bills that would directly affect the unions? How many voted on pension reform when they themselves receive a pension? However, simply because there are other issues shouldn't be an excuse to add more.
You have to think though, and I don't see it in the bill, wouldn't it be interesting for someone to be elected to be their own boss? What if someone with a job in the Governor's Office were elected Governor? Can he keep his job and his salary on top of the Governor's? How about in the Attorney General's office? Can someone effectively do both jobs? How about being employed by the Speaker of the House while serving in the Senate? What kind of mixed loyalties might that cause? It'll be fun to find out.