It was fitting that the the 2012 Portsmouth Institute conference, "Modern Science, Ancient Faith," held at the Portsmouth Abbey school, opened on the topic of Galileo.
Brother Scotti addressed the ways in which other factors brought about the Catholic Church's blunder with respect to Galileo. There were internal politics. Factional rifts between the Jesuits, who were more friendly to Galileo, and the Dominicans. Personality conflicts and ego-driven attacks, including on the part of the "academic superstar" scientist himself.
The bottom line, however, as Scotti told an audience member after the speech, is that the Church has actually done very well with respect to integrating science into its worldview and presentation. But when it got things wrong, with Galileo, it got them spectacularly wrong.
One particularly interesting point arose when an audience member asked whether our intelligence has arguably returned mankind to status as the center of the universe. Scotti replied that, in the old Ptolemaic view, Earth wasn't the pinnacle of the universe, but "the lowest place, the worst place," the place to which frailty sank.
"But when it got things wrong, with Galileo, it got them spectacularly wrong."
Makes one wonder when the church first became fallible, and when it recovered.
Only if one doesn't understand what the Church claims infallibility on.
Posted by: Justin Katz at July 2, 2012 5:55 PMJustin, just commenting, not really seeking an argument.
I know that the church claims infallibility only on Papal Bulls. However if you read some of those from the late medieval period, the error with Galileo is as nothing. Little knowledge of them has survived in the popular memory. Of course,in those days the Vatican had taken the lead of the Germans, issuing bulls that were more in the nature of decrees. Only rarely were they an expression, or codification, of the faith. For instance, by means of a "Bull" the Pope made the Knights Templar exempt from any civil authority or punishment. My Latin is poor, this may have been couched in theological terms.
Posted by: Warrington Faust at July 2, 2012 11:23 PM