Beware the Pied Piper of Progressive Populism

Local NEA agitator Patrick Crowley recently had a piece in the ProJo in which he piggybacks a call for a popular uprising within a book review (The Uprising by David Sirota). I haven’t read the book, but I’m familiar with Sirota’s progressive populist leanings and take them for what they are (ie; I don’t dig the class-warfare aspects, but I’m sympathetic to workers losing jobs overseas to places like China, which engages in all sorts of unfair trade practices). However, while Sirota’s Uprising is a work of non-fiction, I’m not so sure that Crowley’s review can be considered entirely the same, particularly when he tries to marry some of the points made in Sirota’s book to the current political and economic climate here in Rhode Island.


Here’s what I mean. According to Crowley

For more than a decade, the one-party Democratic monopoly in Rhode Island’s General Assembly and weak leadership at the executive level have created a conservative consensus on tax and economic issues — a consensus creating, perhaps deliberately, the economic crisis we now face in the state. A $450 billion deficit doesn’t happen overnight.

Apparently, Rhode Island’s “conservative consensus on tax and economic issues” continues to saddle us with some of the highest tax rates in the country. Yup, that’s right in line with accepted conservative tax policy. (Unless RI unknowingly has been engaging in one of those “new conservatism”‘s we’ve been hearing about). I do agree with Crowley that a $450 billion deficit doesn’t happen overnight: it happens when more is spent on government programs and handouts than is collected in “revenue” (taxes). But those of us familiar with Crowley’s rhetoric know that any sort of broad-based cutting–either in taxes or in spending on most government programs–don’t figure into his plans. This is indicated by what he leaves out of his explanation of an economic populist platform:

Politicians across America, such as [Montana Governor Brian] Schweitzer, or U.S. Senators Sherwood Brow [sic ~ Sherrod Brown] of Ohio, Jon Tester of Montana and Bernie Sanders of Vermont (all of whom Sirota interviews for the book), have learned that economic populism — beating back corporate tax-break give-aways, fighting tax breaks for the wealthy at the expense of popular programs, and demanding that tax cheats pay up — are planks in successful election platforms.

No one likes a tax cheat and I’m not big on corporate welfare myself (though one man’s corporate welfare is another’s economic–or environmental–development), but those are only some of the planks of broad floor that is economic populism. I’m pretty sure that low tax rates across the board–income, sales, property–would be welcomed by most Rhode Island workers. Yet, lower taxes, much less reduced spending, rarely seem to make it into the progressive argument, even when a less onerous tax policy is something that Montana’s Schweitzer, to use one of Crowley’s examples, champions and promotes as a crucial part of making his state successful:

* Montana now has the one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country, with more people working at higher wages than any time in history.
* More taxes have been cut for more Montanans than at any other time in history.
* $1.6 million in new funds for economic development committed in Indian country
* Our state’s wages and income are growing 3rd fastest in the United States.
* Montana has one of the top ten fastest growing economies in the nation.
* Montana has the ninth lowest combined state and local tax burden and the eighth best business tax climate in the country.

Unfortunately, Crowley can’t promote tax cuts because those “popular programs” he cites need to be “financed” and, like most progressives, Crowley is ideologically unable to believe that lower tax rates don’t automatically lead to less revenue. Instead, the answer is always to tax the rich, regardless of the fact that higher taxes on anyone contributes to the overall image of RI being a high tax state. I don’t think that Schweitzer’s Montana lowered taxes only after they managed to attract business and workers. Instead, they had a business and worker friendly tax climate in place. Even the small step of holding the line on the state budget is too much for Crowley, who thinks we’ve already been down this path for too long.

Meanwhile, Rhode Island’s leadership seems intent on following the same path it has been on since the Lincoln Almond days. If Rhode Island is going to make progress, the economic populism energizing other parts of America needs to continue to bubble up from the bottom here at home.

Where Crowley sees “the same path”, most of us would say that, finally–with this year’s reduced state budget and holding the line on taxes–the Democrats in the General Assembly are going down a new path. Or at least they’ve stopped in their tracks.
But Crowley and his fellow progressives in the unions and advocacy groups have had a rough year and I suppose that losing one budget battle out of the last 30 or so is a major shock to the system when you’ve come to view increased spending on your favorite programs as a birthright. In reaction, according to Crowley, he and his progressive populists are channeling their inner Alinsky and taking it to the streets.

Sirota repeatedly refers to Alinsky’s admonition to young organizers to “start where the world is, not where [they] want it to be.” It is a cogent reminder for those of us engaged in the uprising here in Rhode Island, and I believe it truly is an uprising. Teachers are organizing against the economic chaos of our state’s refusal to enact a funding formula while passing the tax cap Paiva-Weed bill. Such non-traditional labor organizations as Jobs with Justice and Fuerza Laboral are linking with such community groups as DARE, and Immigrants United to engage in direct-action events.

Funny thing is, to most of us, “where the world is” in Rhode Island is a heavily taxed state with too much money going into government. This exacerbates the business unfriendly image of RI. Crowley’s idea of an uprising, which includes calls for higher taxes on “the rich” and businesses for the sake of expanding government programs, is neither revolutionary nor different from what has been business as usual in Rhode Island for the past several years. And if the current Democratic leadership is so bad, why not promote the good-government/clean elections reform of doing away with the straight-party vote option?
Make no mistake, Crowley’s goal is to re-brand boilerplate union- and community organizational tactics by calling it something else. (Sounds like someone has been reading their George Lakoff). Crowley’s program is in the tradition of Saul Alinsky-style community organization, which urges the organizer to let people know just how bad they have it and then direct them to take action against those whom the organizer says is to blame. Cleverly, Crowley is trying to co-opt the anger and disgust felt by the average Rhode Islander towards our state government into his progressive brand of economic populism, heavy on the class-envy, hold the tax- and spending cuts please.
This is not to say that there aren’t legitimate reasons for a push back against real economic injustice. Our politicians have implemented policies and programs that have done well by the unions and advocacy groups and it is this undisciplined fiscal behavior that is the real economic injustice being perpetrated against tax-paying Rhode Islanders. It would be a shame if Rhode Islanders mistook Crowley’s call to action as anything other than what it really is: an attempt to maintain the failed tax and spend policies that led Rhode Island down this path of fiscal ruin in the first place. Rhode Islanders should heed the spirit of Crowley’s call, but vote according to their own, not Crowley’s, self-interest.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Frank
Frank
12 years ago

In crowley’s piece he actually supposes that the General Assembly and Governor’s conservative policy (huh?) have, “perhaps deliberately” … “created the economic crises we now face”. This is moon bat territory that few dare to tread, yet crowley is right at home with these sorts of outlandish, nonsensical, unsupported statements.

Tom W
Tom W
12 years ago

Bravo Marc!
We have many things to worry about here in Rhode Island, but I don’t believe that we need be concerned that many Rhode Islanders will be duped by Pat Crowley’s rhetoric.
It’s a pump for his usual cheerleading squad over at RI Future, and will sound great to a few black beret wearing college students at Brown and RISD (and several middle-aged hangers on who live on the East Side, you know, the one’s who don’t want to acknowledge that the 1960’s are over).
But other than those marginal groups, Pat Crowley’s spiel is just wishful thinking on his part. He is representative of “working families” in a similar sense as the latte drinking “condescension we can believe in” Obama revering crowd.

Mike Cappelli
Mike Cappelli
12 years ago

Yup. I saw the piece. Didn’t bother to read it. Why would I? It would be a complete waste of time. I did read the comics, though.

Citizen Critic
Citizen Critic
12 years ago

The bottom line is that American workers need to upgrade their skills to compete in a global marketplace. The idea that US workers should have lifetime guarantees for their jobs is absurd.
Why should we dumb down our economy because some people are more comfortable with the past? The centralized economy failed the USSR.
Protectionism and rewarding workers for their seniority over their productivity only damages our economy. Who is pushing that concept? GM is teetering on the edge of backruptcy in large part because of those radical union ideas.
American workers need to stop blaming China and start trying to upgrade their own skills. Embracing socialism won’t get them far.

Tom W
Tom W
12 years ago

Yeah, but with socialism everyone gets to wear those nifty “Che” t-shirts – you know, that logo that has been spotted in some of Obama’s campaign offices!

Monique
12 years ago

“It is a cogent reminder for those of us engaged in the uprising here in Rhode Island, and I believe it truly is an uprising.”
What is the basis of the uprising? Government services that push us beyond the fourth highest taxed state in the country? Remember that the current budget, while unprecedented in that it was not a larger budget than last year, really only froze us at that tax ranking.
Haven’t we pretty much gone as far as we can in the direction of high taxes and expensive government services? As Marc said, a real uprising would be to go in the opposite direction.
With the 2009 budget, the General Assembly and the Governor took the first step down that productive path. We need to continue that way, not stop and turn around, as Pat is recommending.

Tom W
Tom W
12 years ago

The Lefties like Pat Crowley are still hoping to repeat the October 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, pining for a “workers of the world unite!” of their own. I think that this is why they’re so fond of staging demonstrations, for this is as close as they can get.
Much to their dismay, most of the “working class” isn’t buying what they’re peddling. Even the former “workers paradises” of the Russia and China are going capitalist, leaving places like North Korea and Cuba as impoverished poster-countries for the failures of collectivism (and its subsets communism. fascism and socialism).
Other than a few redoubts – academia; organized labor and the Democratic Party – collectivism has largely been relegated to where it belongs: “the ash heap of history.”

joe bernstein
joe bernstein
12 years ago

The “collectivists” we have here,also known as limousine liberals,will be fine with a socialist system just until they find out that they have to share a crapper down the hall with twenty or thirty other people.

observer
observer
12 years ago

Joe, your comment reminds me of the scene in “Dr. Zhivago” when Yuri and his family arrive back in Moscow after the revolution at what had been the family home and find out they must now share it with about 40 people. Ah, the romance of revolution!
How come nobody makes movies anymore like David Lean did, Zhivago, Lawrence of Arabia, Bridge on the River Kwai, A Passage to India. I guess there’s not enough explosions and car chases in those movies for today’s public.
Happy 4th everyone, and especially to you Joe for your long service in what must have been a difficult job at times.

Monique
12 years ago

Same here for that last comment, Observer. But you’ve given me an idea. Joe B’s professional career would make a great movie.

joe bernstein
joe bernstein
12 years ago

My career might make a somewhat bizarre/dark humor movie, and thanks for being so nice,but the agent whose career would make an unbelievable film would be Hipolito Acosta(he’s writing a book)-he spent about 15 years on undercover assignments,including the biggest smuggling case in southern New England history,right here in RI.he spent time undercover in a Mexican jail;he performed heroically during the eruption of Mt.Pinatubo while assigned to Manila;he almost drowned(2 other people did)while being “smuggled” into the US;he broke a case in Illinois where we arrested 21 state license employees and closed down 13 driving schools;and he busted more document counterfeiters than I can count.I don’t think Hollywood would like him-he never had to shoot anybody(nor did I)and you know how thos gun control advocates in Hollywood crave high body counts.
The funny thing about Acosta is that he is the least egotisic person you could meet.I worked with him in Chicago and that one case here,and enjoyed every minute of it.
All of you have a great 4th of July.
Did I mention Acosta is Hispanic? :))

joe bernstein
joe bernstein
12 years ago

One more thing-Acosta at one point became the second man from the top in a major smuggling organization based in Chicago-he told us we better take it down pretty quick or he’d be arresting himself!!

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.