The Big Idea That Nobody’s Having

Hey, Rhode Islanders: That deferred tax increase known as “transportation bonds” (and claiming all those wonderful federal tax dollars) to which you just assented? Not enough:

A special state panel yesterday discussed several ideas to raise money to fix the state’s roads and bridges, from tolls on Route 95 and the Sakonnet River bridge to increases in the gas tax and higher traffic fines.
But none of the suggestions would come close to raising the $300 million a year the state Department of Transportation says it needs to catch up from years of neglect.
On a separate front, Jerome F. Williams, the governor’s director of administration, offered the administration’s first plan for covering the budget deficit that threatens to force major cutbacks in bus service or even a shutdown of the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority. …
During the first year, the plan would impose a new wholesale tax on fuel for motor vehicles, raising $43 million per year. It would also increase vehicle registration fees by $10 per year,raising $22.9 million, and increase the penalties for traffic violations by 20 percent, raising $1.8 million per year. The difference would come from smaller increases in other fees. …
In later years, Williams would add toll boothson Route 95 near the Connecticut border , raising another $40 million.

While reading the article, I saw a brief glimmer of hope that officials at least had brought some of the correct answers into the conversation — even if only to dismiss them:

Williams’ plan avoids a number of politically difficult possibilities which the panel has talked about ….

But then I read on:

… such as imposing tolls on the planned new Sakonnet River Bridge and on the Mt. Hope Bridge, and raising the state sales tax.

Yes, the fatal thinking continues, including such bad old habits as setting government goals to merely “try and get through this year” and promising that tax increases would only be “for a short period of time.”
How about this: Given the central importance of infrastructure and public transportation and the utter economic insanity of increasing Rhode Island’s taxes and fees, let’s redirect funds that are currently allocated for purposes that may help a few but are proving to harm us all over the long run. (I refer, of course, to the state’s welfare and union sieves.) Hey, we can even promise that the cuts will only be “for a short period of time” — namely, until the state can actually afford to pay for the programs and benefits.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
15 years ago

The thieving bastards in the General Assembly will not get it until the state files for bankruptcy. Let’s get on with it. The best thing that could happen.

Tom W
Tom W
15 years ago

Who is John Galt?
An honest, productive guy who looked around Rhode Island, realized that the parasitic class was now the majority, and left for another state from which he could, over the next several years, watch from afar Rhode Island’s slow-motion fiscal and economic collapse.

15 years ago

I debated this ad nauseum with Walsh and Sgourous on the other blog a few months ago. The bottom line is that it is ILLEGAL for a state to toll an Interstate highway built with federal funds-like RI’s stretch of 95. There are a few pilot programs which allow high-occupancy lanes to be constructed and tolled but a state just can’t “put up a toll” on an Interstate. Progressive fool Ed Rendell just tried to do this on I-80 and the feds shot him down-quickly. If you really want to piss off Walsh and Sgouros ask them to name a single Interstate which has been closed to free traffic. You will hear all kinds of verbal dynastics about how “it can be done” and “we can do it”-but not the name of a single Interstate. Because it is illegal! U.S. says no to Interstate 80 tolls Rendell: Privatize turnpike or face crisis Friday, September 12, 2008 By Tom Barnes, Post-Gazette Harrisburg Bureau HARRISBURG — The federal government’s rejection yesterday of a plan to put tolls on Interstate 80 means Pennsylvania is facing a transportation “crisis,” and heightens the need for the Legislature to quickly approve a private bid to operate the Pennsylvania Turnpike, Gov. Ed Rendell said. Mr. Rendell said yesterday he doesn’t think the $12.8 billion lease offer from a consortium of New York-based Citigroup and the Spanish firm Abertis “will stay on the table past Jan. 1. It would be playing Russian roulette for the Legislature not to act [this fall] on the Abertis proposal.” He said the offer to lease the turnpike for 75 years is the only alternative left for the state to raise the $1 billion a year it needs to fix crumbling roads and bridges and to bail out struggling mass transit agencies, including… Read more »

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.