Towns on the Teat, Too.

This article is a few weeks old, but I’ve been holding on to it because the statement contained therein really requires philosophical correction:

One by one, mayors and municipal managers from Cumberland to Westerly told the House Finance Committee on Thursday that the midyear aid cuts proposed by Governor Carcieri will wreak havoc on local services and tax rates, shifting a state budget crisis onto the backs of municipal employees and property owners already feeling the bite of previous state-aid cuts.

If the towns and cities have allowed themselves to rely heavily on the state for financial support and the state is having a budget crisis, then the crisis isn’t shifted, it’s shared. We should expect our municipal leaders to be more self-motivated, active, and demonstrative than welfare queens.
What really irks me about the attitude expressed in the article, though, is the degree to which government operates as if behind a wall of glass. Mayors and managers shouldn’t be wasting time on their knees at the state house. Even were groveling successful in staving off cuts to “state aid” this year, circumstances are only going to be more dire in the next budget unless things change dramatically in Rhode Island.
In other words, officials should be turning to the people who elected them (or who elected the people who appointed them), explaining what the state must do to turn things around, and more importantly, encouraging residents to get involved — not to join in the groveling, but to run for office and join taxpayer groups and the like. After all, they pay the taxes whether it’s to the town or the state, and when revenue improves for the state, it will improve for the municipalities, as well.
Of course, this assumes that municipal leaders have a clue about what might save Rhode Island — an optimistic assumption if ever there was one.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
12 years ago

There is plenty of blame to go around.
Indeed, to hell with the cities and towns that give away the store in union contracts …little to no cost sharing on healthcare, salary increases every year regardless of economic conditions, clothing allowances, lavish retirement benefits, etc. Stop feeding the beast and cut state aid.
Having said that, the General Assembly have been co-conspirators. They make the laws & rules in which the cities and towns must operate.
Free the cities and towns from the stranglehold that the unions have on them by fixing the collective bargaining laws (i.e. repeal them) and by allowing RI to be a “Right to Work” state.
Let cities and towns pay what they can afford to pay, not what some arbitrator says they must pay or what some union extorts via work-to-rule and other terrorist tactics.
Allow cities and towns to procure personel services in the same manner that they procure all other items …establish specs and requirements and then put it out to bid, as opposed to having to eliminate competition from the equation by being forced to “bargain” with a union.
Any union member that doesn’t like that is free to go find a job elsewhere.

12 years ago

AMEN to the above. We have GOT to deal with the legacy costs (pensions) that are taking at least 1/3 of all budgets BEFORE a single service is delivered. I’ve not heard one administrator talk about taking some of our money back. We cannot continue to “find” more revenue streams.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.