Union Rhetoric and Fiscal Reality

There was a rally for Providence teachers yesterday and union leaders, who never met a crisis they didn’t like to exploit, regaled the crowd with unsurprising rhetoric that served to add heat but shed little light.
AFT Union President Randi Weingarten:

[The Providence teacher dismissal notices are] the most wrong-headed thing I have seen in a season of wrong-headed actions against American workers….Something is insane in Providence…On a week where teachers and students were taking a well-deserved break, a secret plan was being hatched in Providence. They thought no one would be there to hear it. Fire everyone — that was their plan….Mass firings don’t fix the budget. They say, ‘This is a city that doesn’t care about schools.’

Got that? A liberal urban mayor and his staff of like-minded folks were hatching a “secret plan” that no one wold “hear”. To seriously think that this is a purposefully malicious act on the part of the Mayor and his staff is ridiculous. Apparently, the best way to keep it secret is to announce it at press conferences and public meetings. Maybe the execution wasn’t perfect, but a progressive conspiracy against a bloc of progressive political supporters this ain’t. And, for the thousandth time, a notice of potential “dismissal” is a far cry from being “fired.”
RI AFL-CIO President George Nee:

You agreed to Race to the Top. And it got you fired. Mr. Mayor, support collective bargaining. Let’s not go down the road with Wisconsin.

Logical fallacy alert. (If one supports reform it doesn’t logically follow that one will be fired). Everything that has been done has been done as per the agreement that was collectively bargained. The teachers were dismissed because layoffs wouldn’t have allowed for the flexibility required to balance the budget.
This is the new reality and it’s not just the Democratic Mayor of Providence who is staring at deficits and proposing cuts. Democratic Governors in New York, Maryland, California, West Virginia, Missouri and Connecticut (just to, you know, name a few) are also proposing job cuts and pensions and salary changes to help balance budgets.
So, rhetoric or reality? Union-busting, secret plans hatched by a liberal Democrat and his staff in the middle of a public meeting and presented at a press conference? Or dealing with budget deficits in one of the few ways available as per a collectively bargained contract?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike Cappelli
Mike Cappelli
13 years ago

Can you imagine wanting so bad to be considered a professional, and then having to listen to the utter nonsense and lies put forth by a bunch of retards that head your union?
Oh yeah, real professional! The venom from that hag Weingarten is priceless. Makes me want to be in that little club. And Purcell – was he drunk? Man, what a great face for those “professionals”. Priceless!

13 years ago

Usually when you’re talking about representation you’re talking about an attorney or a professional agent. If an attorney represented somebody the way these loud-mouthed liars represent their teachers, they would be sanctioned or disbarred by the Bar Assocation. If it weren’t mandated by government to pay the outrageous salaries of union leadership, at least half of the teachers would stop paying dues immediately. I would be embarrassed beyond words to be represented by these types.

13 years ago

Sorry for the shameless self-plug, but it seems Marc and I hit on exactly the same points this morning:
Why in the world are these people allowed to lie this badly? Why would Taveras ever want to sit across from a table with these people with the things they say? I sure wouldn’t.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.