Debt Ceiling Stand-Off: So President Obama Wants Republicans to Undertake What Democrats Refused to Do (Raise Taxes)

I’m not a big fan of Karl Rove. But he’s got a point here.

Mr. Obama has offered no evidence since becoming president that he wants to restrain the upward trajectory of government spending. He does want higher taxes to pay for significantly higher federal spending. But he wants Republicans to deliver the tax increases, since Democrats couldn’t pass them last year despite controlling both chambers of Congress.

The President’s lack of specificity as to spending cuts also does not do much to enhance his credibility in this matter. The headline on Tarpon’s Swamp describes the President’s approach perfectly.

I’ll Gladly Cut Spending On Tuesday For a Tax Increase Today

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sick and tired
sick and tired
10 years ago

No interest in restraining government spending? You mean pay freezes for federal employees doesn’t restrain spending? 500k fewer federal employees isn’t restraining spending? Really. Wow.

Kerry
Kerry
10 years ago

Do you get your information from any other place than Fox News and the Drudge Report?

Andrew
Editor
10 years ago

If spending is being meaningfully restrained, then why do we have to raise the debt limit by such a huge amount?

Dan
Dan
10 years ago

Sick and tired – the federal pay freeze is a joke. It only applies to COLA, which would have been basically nothing anyway. You should be ashamed of yourself for falling for such an elementary political maneuver.
Who were these “500k fewer federal employees”? Are you talking about the census worker temporary hires?

ANTHONY
ANTHONY
10 years ago

Lest we forget Lord Hussein submitted a budget of his own. The senate vote? 99-0 against. He’s a superb orator in the mold of a traveling snake oil salesman that wants you to swallow his expensive magic elixir. You get sick and the charlatan tells you that you drank too much. Crunch time folks. Pretender Hussein hates the USA and it’s founders. It is the Tea Party who won the battle against tyrannical England in 1776 and it
will be the Tea Party again who wins this battle. The Republicans may not have the stomach.

Tommy Cranston
Tommy Cranston
10 years ago

Actually the vote was 97-0.
The game’s over folks. This year we will hit 100% GDP-Debt ratio, a figure no country can maintain economic growth with. Ask Greece or Japan.

sick and tired
sick and tired
10 years ago

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/11/paul-krugman/paul-krugman-says-government-jobs-have-fallen-half/
I was mistaken, not 500k fewer Federal employees, but total government employees.
Andrew, I’m not smart enough to understand all the complex economics that have gotten us to this situation. But I disagree that there is “no evidence…that he wants to restrain the upward trajectory of government spending.”
The deal that Obama is proposing has $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, including raising the medicare age requirement.
But I don’t even know why I bother commenting here every once in a while. It’s like talking to the glass of a store window that has a TV with Fox News on behind it. Depressing that there is no middle ground EVER from Republicans.

Patrick
Patrick
10 years ago

“Depressing that there is no middle ground EVER from Republicans.”
Right. The Democrats are the moderates and so far removed from the left.
When do those $1.2T in cuts kick in? 2015?

ANTHONY
ANTHONY
10 years ago

“Sick and Tired”….that’s the feeling all the producers in this country have. We are sick and tired of funding the welfare state (see Dallas housing voucher gone amok video from today) and the massive entitlements that go with it.
Fox News? You do not need Fox News to see the declining standards in this country. Just open your eyes and ears. Oh I forgot we conservatives have Fox News and the only outlets the liberals have are:NBC,CBS,ABC,MSNBC, CNBC,BET,PBS…..yup we got FOX News.

Dan
Dan
10 years ago

Sick and tired – As much as I detest Krugman and Politifact for the way they twist words and warp reality to fit their biases – from the article you posted:

First, let’s look at federal government employment, which accounts for just 13 percent of all government employment. The number of federal workers has increased by 38,000 over the same period — an increase of 1.4 percent.
And if you separate out the U.S. Postal Service, the growth was even bigger. Non-postal federal employment — about 10 percent of all government employment — increased over the same period by 139,000 workers, or 6.7 percent.
The decline in government employment clearly wasn’t driven by job losses at the federal level. It came from state and local government.

You understand that Obama only has influence over federal hiring, not state hiring, correct?
As a sidenote, why the hell is the Postal Service growing? It should be phased out over the next 10 years.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.