Pensions

Cranston Pensions: Rhode Island… with Emphasis

By Justin Katz | February 13, 2012 |

The RI Center for Freedom & Prosperity had published data covering all of Cranston’s public-sector retirees, and I’ve posted a general comparison of the numbers with those for the state system overall.

Negotiate And We Won’t Litigate: NEA-RI Brandishes a Paper Tiger

By Monique Chartier | February 7, 2012 |

In light of recent court judgements which have failed to uphold changes to public employee retirement benefits and the corresponding possibility that last session’s pension reform law will eventually be deemed illegal by a court, NEA-RI’s Robert Walsh has a suggestion, via WPRI, for the state: negotiate. That’s why the four state leaders who pushed…

General Assembly Trying to Further Mess Up the Pension System

By Patrick Laverty | February 3, 2012 |

House Bill #7201 submitted by State Reps Savage, San Bento, Ajello, Blazejewski and DaSilva is an attempt to force the teachers at the Rhode Island Mayoral Academies (RIMA) into the state pension system. Currently, the staff at RIMA are in a defined contribution plan, or more specifically a 401k plan. They pay into the system,…

Is Providence Cooking the Books Now?

By Patrick Laverty | January 31, 2012 |

Back in October, Rhode Island’s pension system also got national notice due to a union official, Paul Valletta accusing General Treasurer Raimondo of manufacturing a crisis: Paul Valletta of the State Association of Firefighters said Raimondo “cooked the books” with actuarial assumptions and conservative market projections that exaggerate the pension system’s problems. He accused her…

Municipal Pensions as Covenant

By Justin Katz | January 30, 2012 |

The principles underlying debate about Providence’s ability to suspend the cost of living adjustments (COLAs) of its public-sector retirees are fascinating. On one hand, we’re told that they’re contractual, unlike the state-level pensions, which are legislated: Unlike state-level public employee pension benefits, which are set by state law, municipal retirement benefits are incorporated in collective-bargaining…

The Market Undoes Pension Reform

By Justin Katz | January 27, 2012 |

Remember the hoopla when General Treasurer and the state Retirement Board lowered the expected rate of investment return from 8.25% to 7.5%, thus throwing the system into underfunded panic? (Of course, the system should have already been in underfunded panic, but we needn’t rehash all that, just now.) Well, according to Ted Nesi, the return…

Public Pension Escrow Accounts?

By Monique Chartier | January 7, 2012 |

Liz Boardman and Iain Wilson have an excellent article in Thursday’s South County Independent previewing the new General Assembly session from the perspective of some area legislators. In it, Rep Spencer Dickinson (D-South Kingstown) stated that He plans to call for the creation of state and municipal escrow accounts, so the money is there if…

The Pension Questions Still Not Asked

By Justin Katz | January 6, 2012 |

So, I’m watching General Treasurer Raimondo’s speech upon accepting the Manhattan Institute’s Urban Innovator Award (via Ted Nesi). She keeps talking about “solving the problem” and “fixing the pension,” and some of the inevitable questions had to do with “what’s next” — the assumption being that the state pension problem is fixed. Still, I don’t…

Contractual Obligation Without Language

By Justin Katz | December 28, 2011 |

The technical considerations of language and history are likely different, but this outcome in Woonsocket doesn’t bode well for pension reforms, I’d say: The city argued that language in one section of the contract mentions dental coverage and refers only to active employees, while other sections extend health-care coverage to retirees, but not dental care.…

How Easily the Hybrid Pension Reform Can Be Undone

By Justin Katz | November 28, 2011 |

Here’s a question: As Rhode Island legislators seek forgiveness for their pension reform votes, just how much will the unions have to improve their overall negotiating stance in order to completely eliminate the adverse effects of the hybrid component of that reform? The answer: Seen in terms of annual raises, a 2.5% increase — that…