The featured image of this post compares the original cover of Mountain Music by the band Alabama with the censored version now used for music streaming services. I should specify that I’m not alleging the band and the companies that manage its music were forced to make the change by a government agency, but censorship it…
The short answer is that we shouldn’t, but Bill Bartholomew’s attempt is worth a double-take and some thought about what he’s missing: at nearly 68k, Scott Avedisian’s termination payment is almost as much as the contract that the most exciting player in college basketball, Caitlin Clark, signed after being selected first overall in the WNBA draft…
Somehow, despite ample reason for civic disappointment, I find I’m becoming less cynical as I get older, not more. Even now, when I come across reasoning like that expressed by young progressive Democrat Representative David Morales, I can’t help but feel hope that we can salvage reason from the flames of ideology: Here’s the reality:…
The point can’t be stressed enough that Rhode Islanders should understand the Washington Bridge debacle as a representative lesson on our state government. For that reason, not the least, Mark Patinkin’s conversations with local affected business owners is an article to print and review periodically in the future. Restauranteurs and venue owners bought and built…
Arguably, Eric Abbenante— overstates the degree of “debate” in this clip featuring Dr. Phil and Bill Maher, but the difference in point of view he highlights is the crucial one. Here’s Abbenante: Bill Maher and Dr Phil debate the importance of family and religion: “You think family and faith are a big fix to the…
Brandon Busteed’s argument in Forbes well taken: U.S. teachers are dead last among all occupational groups and professions in feeling their opinions count at work, that their supervisor creates an open and trusting environment and that they are treated with respect each day. Teachers are also the highest of all professions in experiencing burn-out and…
Whatever one’s political leanings, the incentives of government must be understood as simply reality. Government agencies don’t have to create a product or service that people will voluntarily purchase. Rather, they must find activities for which they can justify forcing people who are not the direct beneficiaries to pay. This model is justified, in some…
By its nature, advocacy journalism glosses over the details that many would consider crucial. Headlines from a pair of such articles by Katie Mulvaney in the Providence Journal illustrate the point: Six months pregnant with nowhere to go – an unhoused woman’s plight on RI’s streets After months of sleeping on the street, pregnant woman finally…
In the last couple decades, Americans (at least those who occupy seats in academia and mainstream media) appear to have lost their ability to distinguish between upholding a principle and supporting any given people who might benefit from that principle from time to time. Nobody likes to defend groups that are broadly deplored, like Nazis…
Almost in passing during a recent podcast featuring Greg McKeown, Tim Ferriss stepped into an idea I’ve been contemplating lately: [A]s my job, I interview some of the top performers in the world, hundreds of them, and the change that I have seen for those people in that subset who are already, I think most…
Lance Lambert, who appears to be a reporter on the housing beat, shared a table of increases in housing prices in the 50 largest metro areas. As the following snip from the table shows, Providence experienced the third-largest increase over the past year: Various contextual points are important to remember. Metros can vary in size,…
For those willing to step outside the boundaries of “just the way we do things,” the justification for mandatory schooling backstopped by taxpayer-funded government schools is an interesting question. I’d pick up the rope and pull for the “yes, justified” side. A country founded on freedom and individual achievement and held together by abstract agreement…
The Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity has called for the removal of Rhode Island Education Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green. They make their case here. I echo their call. During her tenure, Education Commissioner Angelica Infante-Green has failed to implement successful education reforms. She has instead prioritized questionable, experimental, non-education initiatives in Rhode Island’s K-12…
The latest shiny news object in Rhode Island media is the revelation that the Tidewater soccer stadium will cost Rhode Island taxpayers $132 million in order to finance $27 million of the construction costs, or $4.4 million per year for 30 years. Grumbling is being heard from people with familiar names — “obviously these are…
As he’s done for a long time, Mark Steyn zeros in on the truth with panache:
There are times, however, when it is necessary not to conceal it. This week’s Trump Trial of the Week is the bazillionth attempt by the ruling party to nail the leader of the opposition on …something, anything, whatever’s to hand. So naturally a certain artfulness is required. In this case, if one accepts as true the charges of corrupt prosecutor Alvin Bragg, Trump paid former crony Michael Cohen to pay off Stormy Daniels. Which would be a falsification of business records. Which is, under the “laws” of New York, a misdemeanour – albeit one in which the statute of supposed limitations has already kicked in. So Bragg is arguing that the expired misdemeanour is actually a non-expired felony, because it was used to cover up another crime.
What other crime he has not said. And, as is now familiar in the State of New York, the corrupt judge Juan Manuel Merchan has been happy to indulge him.
… why all the Trump cases wind up in the hands of this particular Biden donor is a mystery to me.
Well, actually it isn’t: much of “American justice” is stinkingly corrupt. QED.
One wonders if the enormity of the corruption has become its own incentive for Democrats to turn a blind eye. Once down the road of acknowledging it, what else might be overturned?
As shocking videos emerge of progressive fascism showing its antisemitic face, Nick Freitas’s on-point observation here comes to mind:
Americans have been had in a major way (this issue not the least), and I’m not sure there’s any way to turn things around.
One has to wonder such things after seeing posts like this, from Rhode Island Democrat State Senator Tiara Mack:
Teenagers lack the maturity and experience to know what it is they need to learn or how it should be taught. Raising doubt about adults capacity in this regard would be a fair response, but for this purpose we draw the line at 18. If anything, given the lengthening of adolescence in modern America, we should be considering a move in the other direction — opening elections only when people are a bit older.
In any event, giving teens a means to vote themselves other people’s money would be more of a disaster than Rhode Island already faces.
While we’re on the matter, contrast Mack’s suggestion with progressives’ antipathy to school choice. One suspects she wants kids voting in government school elections because they’ll be easier for radicals and union organizers to manipulate.
As I suggested in a post this morning, it’s an error to think we can impose requirements on the status quo and not risk any loss of what we have. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) principles are the archetype of this thinking. Admittedly, I don’t know whether a U.S. Navy officer who didn’t notice that the scope on his AR was backwards, among other errors, in a photo-op — not to mention the assistants who prepared it and the media professionals who developed and promoted the post — was a victim of DEI, but it’s a good warning sign, nonetheless.
The more we prioritize things that are irrelevant (at best, nice to have) to jobs, the more likely it is that the people who take them will lack some other experience. We don’t live in a world in which there are just so many identically good candidates for every role that new requirements will have no effect. Pretending otherwise is going to get a lot of people killed.
This flaw of inexperience among the young (and progressives) has become far too pervasive in our society and is particularly notable in Rhode Island. People seem to think that the current state of affairs has been established and will continue indefinitely, so we can shape it like clay to the future we want to see. Investors will continue to build businesses… producers will continue to produce… minority parties will continue to fight the good fight to keep representative democracy honest. And so on. That’s not how reality works, though.
The above was my reaction to this tweet from left-wing Democrat state representative David Morales:
It might be nice to hire a chief executive with intimate and specific experience with the product, but past experience as a customer is not typically an overwhelming advantage and certainly not one that can’t be compensated once in the role (not least because customer experiences differ). Morales’s underlying assumption is that there is a pool of indistinguishably high-quality candidates for the role, so adding a mandate won’t have any negative effects.
The more likely outcome, from which Rhode Island increasingly suffers, is that the pool of candidates will be so uniformly unqualified that additional requirements won’t make things notably worse. The first step to fixing this problem is a more mature understanding of how reality actually functions.
On the list of people for whom the exposure of social media has been a source of disappointing exposure, novelist Stephen King has got to be near the top. Like his books or not (and, honestly, given the content, I regret the influence that he had on my younger life), authors are generally placed in the “intellectual” category, and one would expect more insight than tweets like this:
I’m on the pro-life side of this issue, but I also wish we could have honest discussions about public policy. The anachronism of this state law isn’t evidence that the federal government has to set policy for every state in the country, which was essentially the state of affairs while the horrible Roe v. Wade ruling was in effect. Rather, it should be a reminder that we have an entire system built around the principle that people can change the laws under which they’re governed over time.
It’s telling that advocates for the permissibility of killing of children are so much more focused on deriving political benefit from old laws than changing them where they can be changed. Apparently, what they really want is a world in which a rich old writer from Maine can tell the people of Arizona what sort of laws they live under.
The Rhode Island Office of Revenue Analysis releases regular reports summarizing the state’s tax credit programs, and sometimes progressive politicians and journalists get a news story out of them. What’s disappointing is the paucity of the opposing voices. According to Katherine Gregg’s Providence Journal article the Rhode Island Business Coalition is fine with ending the program for any new participants.
For their part, the authors of the report acknowledge that the businesses that use the program tend to be among the largest, so without programs designed to make them stay, like tax credit programs, the state’s economy could suffer.
There we see the underlying problem that nobody wants to address. Rhode Island’s economic policy is terrible. We’ve taken a beautiful state in a great location and made it so difficult and risky to operate in that we have to lure businesses here. Progressives with a coherent philosophy should realize this is their ideal policy. They get to pick and choose who gets relief from what imposition and to maintain a lever for bribery and ideological pressure.
I’m all for ending tax credit programs, but we should lower taxes and regulations generally. If we make Rhode Island a beacon for economic activity, businesses will pay their full taxes to be here.
I don’t want to read too much into a few seconds of video, but something is chilling about progressive Democrat Representative Brandon Potter’s face as Meara began to speak in favor of Republican Representative Patricia Morgan’s bill to prevent transgender-related mutilation of children:
His facial expression is not just of hatred. It’s cold, as if promising that one day he hopes not to have to sit there and be polite while people speak blasphemies.
That means most of us have to be servants to somebody else. That’s why a political party that still pretends it’s “for the little guy” is relentlessly targeting “little guys” who work for themselves. This video from John Stossel is worth watching:
If you’re independent, you’re difficult to manage. If top-down government can pressure top-down business with the aid of top-down labor unions, things are easier (and more profitable) for the people at the top.
For those of us who’ve been mystified by economic news, E.J. Antoni’s summary of results from the March employment report is worth a read. The key confusion is that “the headline numbers once again look good.” Yet, all the jobs are part time, with Americans replacing their full-time jobs with multiple part-time ones to make ends meet. This finding is found in both the divergence of measures that count workers and jobs and in the number of people working multiple jobs.
Meanwhile, hours per week are trending down, and the ratio of jobs that are government is growing. Too few private-sector jobs are generating economic productivity to support the government jobs. Moreover, most of the “private sector” jobs are actually in fields that are more like government satellites, like health care.
Now add the fact that labor-force participation is down, and the jobs are entirely going to people who are foreign born. There’s nothing wrong with that, per se, but at a time of massive illegal immigration, it presents a troubling picture.
Things are not going well under Biden, no matter what the propagandists insist.
This seems kind of like an important story, but despite some weeks, I’ve seen nothing on it elsewhere:
The problem with our current media situation is that, whether Callahan’s assessment about sanctuary state policies is fair or not, we know for a certainty that we’ll only ever hear that it is not fair from the partisan media, if we hear of the situation at all. They leave us completely in the dark when it would be politically inconvenient to do otherwise.
A point I made yesterday in an essay on Dust in the Light was that we communicate with God in where we choose to direct our attention, and one of the ways in which we make that choice is by how we act. Taking an action is like moving your position on the landscape; your observations will be made in a world in which you took the action. Call it “action space.”
Revisiting James Lindsay’s analysis of Joe Biden’s trans-Easter affront has a related ring:
This provocation, published yesterday, is overwhelmingly likely aiming to feed into those prevailing active measures (“ops”) meant to drag Christians into a positions of fruitful reaction that the Regime can use to clamp down on them. Again, Christian reaction is their real action, and we know for certain that Christian circles are deeply infiltrated with a chest-beating and growing radicalism that is being baited toward and associated with a growing antisemitism. The responses to this post will almost certainly prove this out, btw. Your evil government wants this to happen. They are baiting you into it.
Because we live in a world of free will and Original Sin, God’s is not the only determinant of how the world responds to our actions. Other people play a role, and that can be manipulated. Activists can attempt to provoke actions, as Lindsay suggests, or they can use other techniques, like creating confusion by reacting in contrary ways.
In any event, such manipulation is contrary to fair play, pluralism, and democracy. It’s truly diabolical.
Keep in mind that Thundermist Health Center is interwoven with Rhode Island’s political elite and is working within our school districts:
The “health center” is encouraging mental illness, not helping people with it.
Roger Kimball has in mind, here, the attacks on Donald Trump:
The disappointing thing is how many Americans just don’t care, because the Democrats have whipped them into a frenzy of hatred. We are fortunate, indeed, to have basic rights protected in our fundamental laws, but no piece of paper can withstand the desire of a mob when it takes power. If too many people allow their principles to be corrupted, and if too few speak to uphold those principles that once were shared, the mob will have its way.
Yes, we’ve reached the point that the place to get real, non-partisan journalism is on a social media platform from such people as “Mel,” whose X address is Villgecrazylady. For example:
The thread that follows explains how former Congressman Adam Kinzinger — a darling of the J6-investigation crowd — turned campaign donations into usable funds. Another good example is this pinned post from September 3, which observes the amazing and sudden shift of national politicians to micro-donations. There sure is a lot of smoke around this area; why aren’t mainstream journalists digging into it?
(Meanwhile, by the way, if you’re a Rhode Islander who wants to have some small effect on the well-being of your town or school district, you better find time to keep your miniscule campaign finances in order!)
I’m still puzzled by the presence of the leader of the Rhode Island Foundation in this image:
Is the foundation involved with this project, was this just a bunch of buddies hanging out for a photo op, or is there really no space at all between state government, federal government, and the non-profit sector — all united under the Party?
To be honest, I feel for Gus Schumacher, the young man whom many conservatives mocked when he was the target of pointed questioning from Republican Senator John Kennedy:
Yes, it’s telling that an ostensible witness for greater government control as a response to “climate change” knows very little about the science, but we’ve raised several generations believing a progressive fallacy. Our focus should be there, not the least because it has such opportunity for revelations on their part.
An underlying conceit of progressivism is that what needs to be done is obvious. Schumacher may, indeed, be an expert on that which he’s observed as an Olympic cross-country skier, but he should have some humility when advocating for a particular interpretation of the causes and, especially, humanity’s appropriate response.
The urge to “just do something” is deadly dangerous, and I’m not sure mockery is going to change the hearts of those who’ve been indoctrinated to cultivate it as a first response.
I don’t doubt Ken is being honest about his findings, or lack thereof, from his voter fraud review in 2020, but from the very first, I’ve though he’s was overstating his scope and the extent to which his investigation was conclusive. Very plainly put, “I did not find evidence” is not the same as “there is no evidence to be found.”
Mark Davis, who also investigated the election, takes Block to task on exactly these grounds in an important article on The Federalist which honest journalists would ask Block about in every interview. Unfortunately, we’re a long way from a civic society in which such things could be expected.
One suspects that if Block’s book told an opposing story — if it were Proven, rather than Disproven — its national promotion would have been much less enthusiastic. Odds are good the local media in Rhode Island would have ignored it entirely.
That’s the civil society in which we live. The guardians of the public square aren’t interested in robust, reasonable debate. It’s vulgar political warfare to them. And it’s disappointing to see a good-government advocate cash in on our devolution. Davis ends by suggesting Block won’t likely be hired to do such work again, given how publicly he’s betrayed the trust of his highest-profile client. Local reformers in RI should take note, too.
Joe Biden abusing the authority of his office to buy votes by transferring student loan debt to other Americans is back in the news, and it reminds me that I haven’t seen any mainstream coverage of a disaster facing just about every college-bound family in the United States this year:
If, like me, you have a college-bound high-school senior in your family, you’ve likely been on the receiving end of yet another colossal screw-up by our federal government: the overhaul of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly known as the FAFSA. Every year, students (or more commonly their parents) need to fill out the FAFSA with information about their income, assets, and expenses in order to qualify for federal student aid. Many colleges require the FAFSA before awarding other forms of need-based aid, and some require it to be filed even by people without need before they can qualify for scholarship aid. There’s a more detailed and onerous form, the CSS, operated by the College Board and required by some schools. Filling these out is like doing your taxes, only more so. Typically, the forms are available in October, and schools may set filing deadlines in the fall so that they can deliver financial-aid awards at or near the time they send out acceptances.
Not this year. The FAFSA wasn’t even fully available until January 8, after the Department of Education briefly flicked on the lights on the form on December 30 just so it could claim that it launched in 2023.
This is not just conservative media hype. My family is grappling with this at the moment, and yet the regime media seems not to care. The media’s inability to hold Democrats accountable is one of the strongest argument for voting for the other party, even though Republicans aren’t as apt to give you cash for your vote.
For an academic project not long ago I reviewed data on RIPTA bus routes, including surveys of riders of every line in the system, so the unstated assumption of Antonia Noori Farzan’s recent Providence Journal article on the subject jumped out at me. The headline is, “What’s it like to rely on RIPTA to get around the state? We tried it for a week.” And the not-quite-articulated assumption is that traveling around using public transit should be attractive even when compared with the ease of cars in a suburban area.
There simply is not the demand to maintain a system that can get any given person to any given location in the state painlessly. The area didn’t develop for that, and the people don’t really want it.
Frankly, I doubt progressives even want to provide it for them. It would take larger buses that require fewer drivers in urban areas and smaller buses (or vans) with more amenities for suburban commuters and others, perhaps with less-expensive labor. Journalists would start writing articles about the contrast in comfort level between the two, while at the same time expressing outrage that urbanites have to pay so much to travel to the suburbs.
Cars are efficient modes of travel, and they are symbols of freedom. Government should focus on improving our infrastructure and reversing the regulations designed to make them too expensive for working class Rhode Islanders.
Politics This Week: A New Stage for the Self-Promoter
John DePetro and Justin Katz check in on politicians’ emphasis on promotions.
Rhode Island: The Least Advisable Place to Go
If such a thing is possible, news that Rhode Island has — perhaps for the first time in history — the highest unemployment rate in the country is both stunning and unsurprising. With all of our assets and attractions our state’s leaders can’t even keep us ahead of a single other state, let alone in…
Work and Health Should Be Only Indirectly Linked
I’m with Jeff Jacoby: De-linking medical insurance from employment is the key to reforming healthcare in the United States. McCain proposes to accomplish that by taking the tax deduction away from employers and giving it to employees. With a $5,000 refundable healthcare tax credit, Americans would have a strong inducement to buy their own, more…
The Worst of the Campus in the White House
In a chilling piece, yesterday, Andy McCarthy argues — I would phrase it — that Barack Obama is the fruit of the leftist lunacy that has flourished on American campuses: For Obama, that society is an ineradicably racist “white world.” He is more opaque than mentors like Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers, who mince no…
“… we’re going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy”
Setting aside for a moment matters of substance as well as my own preference in the presidential race, Senator Obama has to be saying to himself right about now, “Why didn’t someone tell me about this guy’s mouth?” Enter Joe Biden. Yesterday, the Republican camp was trying to score some points from speeches the Delaware…
Title IX Becoming a Victim of Its Own Success
Title IX has given generations of American girls and young women athletic opportunities on an equal footing, but that success has made it vulnerable to the latest social revolution.
Politics This Week: Political Unspeakables
John DePetro and Justin Katz highlight some unspeakable stories in RI.
Politics This Week: Arrested Hope
John DePetro and Justin Katz review some of the distractions and calamities in Rhode Island government.
Reflecting on Rhode Island’s Robbers
Representative Michael Chippendale directs Rhode Islanders’ attention to the party responsible for the Ocean State’s condition.
Politics This Week: Under Their Thumb
John DePetro and Justin Katz warn of growing government control and corruption.
Politics This Week: When the Clowns Control
John DePetro and Justin Katz review the latest way government officials and journalists put our state on the wrong track.
As he’s done for a long time, Mark Steyn zeros in on the truth with panache:
There are times, however, when it is necessary not to conceal it. This week’s Trump Trial of the Week is the bazillionth attempt by the ruling party to nail the leader of the opposition on …something, anything, whatever’s to hand. So naturally a certain artfulness is required. In this case, if one accepts as true the charges of corrupt prosecutor Alvin Bragg, Trump paid former crony Michael Cohen to pay off Stormy Daniels. Which would be a falsification of business records. Which is, under the “laws” of New York, a misdemeanour – albeit one in which the statute of supposed limitations has already kicked in. So Bragg is arguing that the expired misdemeanour is actually a non-expired felony, because it was used to cover up another crime.
What other crime he has not said. And, as is now familiar in the State of New York, the corrupt judge Juan Manuel Merchan has been happy to indulge him.
… why all the Trump cases wind up in the hands of this particular Biden donor is a mystery to me.
Well, actually it isn’t: much of “American justice” is stinkingly corrupt. QED.
One wonders if the enormity of the corruption has become its own incentive for Democrats to turn a blind eye. Once down the road of acknowledging it, what else might be overturned?
As shocking videos emerge of progressive fascism showing its antisemitic face, Nick Freitas’s on-point observation here comes to mind:
Americans have been had in a major way (this issue not the least), and I’m not sure there’s any way to turn things around.
One has to wonder such things after seeing posts like this, from Rhode Island Democrat State Senator Tiara Mack:
Teenagers lack the maturity and experience to know what it is they need to learn or how it should be taught. Raising doubt about adults capacity in this regard would be a fair response, but for this purpose we draw the line at 18. If anything, given the lengthening of adolescence in modern America, we should be considering a move in the other direction — opening elections only when people are a bit older.
In any event, giving teens a means to vote themselves other people’s money would be more of a disaster than Rhode Island already faces.
While we’re on the matter, contrast Mack’s suggestion with progressives’ antipathy to school choice. One suspects she wants kids voting in government school elections because they’ll be easier for radicals and union organizers to manipulate.
As I suggested in a post this morning, it’s an error to think we can impose requirements on the status quo and not risk any loss of what we have. “Diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) principles are the archetype of this thinking. Admittedly, I don’t know whether a U.S. Navy officer who didn’t notice that the scope on his AR was backwards, among other errors, in a photo-op — not to mention the assistants who prepared it and the media professionals who developed and promoted the post — was a victim of DEI, but it’s a good warning sign, nonetheless.
The more we prioritize things that are irrelevant (at best, nice to have) to jobs, the more likely it is that the people who take them will lack some other experience. We don’t live in a world in which there are just so many identically good candidates for every role that new requirements will have no effect. Pretending otherwise is going to get a lot of people killed.