Misguided Incentives Drive Public Sector Taxation

Talking about a pro-tax ballot initiative defeated in Oregon during 2002, a Wall Street Journal editorial stated:

When the budget issue is framed in terms of higher taxes, voters don’t understand why government should be exempt from the same spending discipline the rest of us live by. “I am a normal person and when I don’t have enough money I have to change my habits,” 26-year-old Heather Bryan told the AP, explaining her vote against the measure. “Government should be the same way.”

But it isn’t and that begs the question of why?
Terry Moe offers this opinion of why government behavior is problematic (PDF):

Public agencies usually have no competition and are not threatened by the loss of business if their costs go up, while workers and unions know they are not putting their agencies or jobs at risk by pressuring for all they can get. Governmental decisions are not driven by efficiency concerns, as they are in the private sector, but by political considerations, and thus by [political] power.

In comparison, when faced with competition in the private sector, irresponsible management action eventually results in loss of market share, lower profits, and loss of jobs. In other words there are direct and dire consequences to bad behavior.
Or, as Wendell Cox wrote last year in a National Review Online article:

How different government is to the real world of the private sector. When [corporations get] into financial trouble, they cut costs and get concessions from their unions, while doing everything they [can] to maintain service levels. When government gets into trouble, it threatens deep service cuts, all too often cuts aimed at the programs that cause the greatest public consternation, in a calculated strategy to obtain the additional funding necessary to maintain the status quo.

The bottom line consequences for working families and retirees are clear: When taxes increase, your standard of living declines.
Practically speaking, the decline in your family’s standard of living results in some combination of the three following outcomes: (i) you incur new debt; (ii) you use some of your savings; and/or (iii) you reduce your current spending for items such as food, clothes, heating oil, medical care, car repairs as well as savings for college and retirement. All three outcomes are direct and tangible costs incurred by every family – you have less of your hard-earned income to spend on your family’s needs.
It is worth noting that politicians, bureaucrats, and public sector unions suffer no similar consequences when they act irresponsibly. This creates a curious lack of incentive for them to change their behavior.
It was what led Calvin Coolidge to say:

Nothing is easier than spending the public money. It does not appear to belong to anybody. The temptation is overwhelming to bestow it on somebody.

Or, as Lawrence Reed said in his October 2001 speech to the Economic Club of Detroit:

When you spend other people’s money to buy something for someone else, the connection between the earner, the spender and the recipient is most remote – and the potential for mischief is the greatest.

That mischief is obvious when you read about the ridiculous spending approved by lawmakers from both parties. See Citizens Against Government Waste’s Pig Book.
The mischief is clear when you see powerful interest groups (including both corporations and unions) manipulate the system for their advantage, all to the detriment of individual families who lose more of their freedom through ever-increasing tax burdens.
So, what can we do about this problem? Any solution requires a vigilant citizenry that makes the mischief transparent to the voting public. And then it comes down to engaged citizens gathering enough political power to bring about change.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anchor Rising
16 years ago

RE: Why Teachers’ Unions (Not Teachers!) Are Bad For Education

Marc’s posting highlights another outstanding piece by Terry Moe. I would encourage you to read both Marc’s fine posting and the entire editorial by Moe, which you can access in Marc’s posting. As a former East Greenwich School Committee member,…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Rhode Island Politics & Taxation, Part X

This posting continues a periodic series on Rhode Island politics and taxation, building on nine previous postings (I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX). Rhode Island politics has a history of being secretive, keeping relevant information from the…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Underfunding Pensions, Public and Private, can Hurt Taxpayers

Don has posted on the perils to the taxpayer derived from excessive penision and other benefits to government employees and has also posted on the perils to private business if they over-promise benefits to their retirees. Ironically, the poor decision…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Bankrupt Public Pensions: A Time Bomb That Will Explode

A previous posting discussed the perverse incentives that drive public sector economics. A more recent posting addressed further pension woes in the private sector. Marc has brought even more information forward in his posting. Misguided public sector …

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Bankrupt Public Pensions, Part II

A June 5 posting on RI Policy Analysis links to a new Business Week article on the financially insolvent public pensions. …the cost of retirement has continued its steady climb. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, major public pension plans…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Outrageous Benefit Liabilities Continue to Haunt General Motors; Will American Taxpayers End Up Paying the Bill?

Greg Wallace at What Attitude Problem? highlights this week’s news on General Motors, building on the news previously highlighted here on this blogsite. First, a Washington Post article states: General Motors Corp., the world’s biggest automaker, has o…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

Pigs at the Public Trough, Revisited

Time Magazine has an unflattering story about lobbyist Jack Abramoff which builds on some of the points highlighted in this earlier posting: …The spreading scandal is a particular concern to Republicans in light of next year’s midterm elections. Abra…

Anchor Rising
16 years ago

The Highway Bill: “Egregious and Remarkable”

An article entitled Highway Bill Full of Special Projects tells another government spending horror story: When President Eisenhower proposed the first national highway bill, there were two projects singled out for funding. The latest version has, by on…

James Sewell
16 years ago

The inability of Congress to rein in Public Waste lies in the definition of Your Jobs and My Jobs as explained by F.M. Cornford in “Microcosmographia Academica”, published Circa 1908″
“My Jobs are public spirited proposals which, much to my chagrin, happen to involve promotion of myself or my associates. Your Jobs are nefarious schemes for the promotion of you and your associates mascarading as Public Spirited Proposals.”

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.