Rhode Island’s Poor Regional Performance on Income and Poverty
A just released Census Bureau report (pdf format) ranks that median household income of the fifty states plus the District of Columbia over past 12 months. Most of New England is at or above the national average ($46,242)…
- Connecticut $60,941 (3rd)
- Massachusetts $57,184 (5th)
- New Hampshire $56,768 (6th)
- Rhode Island $51,458 (12th)
- Vermont $45,686 (23rd)
- Maine $42,801 (33rd)
- New Hampshire 7.5% (1st)
- Connecticut 8.3% (3rd)
- Massachusetts 10.3% (11th)
- Vermont 11.5% (19th)
- Rhode Island 12.3% (25th)
- Maine 12.6% (26th)
With that qualification, here are two questions worth considering…
- Why does Rhode Island always do so much worse than Massachusetts and Connecticut on these kinds of lists, when we are all subject to the same regional economic trends?
- Why then does New Hampshire, about the same size as Rhode Island in terms of population and at about the same proximity to Boston, do so much better than RI in this survey?
You’d think, since we’ve recently been informed that America is great because of its social programs, that Rhode Island, with its wealth of overly-generous social programs would rate much higher…
Rhode Island offers remarkably (indeed, unjustifiably) generous social services, unmatched by New Hampshire, the state referenced by Andrew for comparison. In fact, the social services we offer make us a destination state.
Is this not the simple answer for our lower median income?
Susan, your neighbors to the North, in Massachusttes have a system of welfare that is generous. It could be in which the way welfare is implemented, more so than the funding of it.