Election Reform

Both of these proposed election reforms seem like “no-brainers,” don’t they? Well, maybe not to everyone…(via ProJo’s Michael P. McKinney)

Requiring voters to provide identification at the polls is either a needed safeguard against recent voter fraud or a way to disenfranchise minorities, the poor, elderly, disabled and the homeless from exercising their right to vote.
That’s how testimony played out before the House Judiciary Committee yesterday on the most heated of several bills that would make changes to state election laws.
The voter ID bill, whose prime sponsor is Rep. Susan Story, R-Barrington, split members of the committee and drew opposition from the state chapters of Common Cause and the American Civil Liberties Union among others…Cliff Montiero, president of the Providence branch of the NAACP, said the organization strongly opposed the bill. “We feel it’s the beginning of the poll tax,” he said. He added: “We do not want to put another burden on the people we are trying to encourage” to participate.
Another Story-sponsored bill drew more uniformly supportive testimony: It would end the option of simply voting for one party or the other in one stroke. She and others said when someone votes one slate but also votes for one candidate from another party, the voter may not realize it can disqualify that ballot.

As I and my fellow citizen/voters stood around the polling place last November–amidst some confusion regarding who should vote in which Ward and put their ballots in which machine–there was a general consensus that a voter-id seemed to make a whole lot of sense. Make the ID free and provide it to everyone. There’s no poll tax, that’s hyperbole. And removing the straight party ticket option is also past due. What do both have in common? They put more responsibility on the shoulder’s of the voter by making the voting process slightly more inconvenient.
I think that being inconvenienced is a price the average Rhode Islander would be willing to pay if they knew that it mitigated against their vote being canceled out by that of red-state residing skinhead voting the straight party ticket for the Republican party?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg
Greg
14 years ago

You can’t insist on photo IDs at the polling place (like every other civilized nation on the planet) nor can you institute the obvious purple ink to indicate people who have already voted. The Democrats will never go for those ideas as both of them negate their ability to multi-vote and allow illegals and the dead to vote.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.