The Rhode Island State Police and the West Warwick Primary

The Projo‘s Talia Buford has details on the Rhode Island State Police’s explanation of why there is an investigation into the Michael Pinga/Stephen Alves Democratic primary, but not into the Erin Lynch/David Bennett result…

The complaint filed by Democratic Party Chairman William Lynch asked the State Police to investigate “voter irregularities” in both the Warwick and West Warwick Democratic primaries. In the complaint, Lynch offered anecdotal evidence of people impersonating registered voters and fraudulently voting in the Alves’ race, and made reference to Republicans who voted “knowingly and intentionally” in both Democratic primaries.
State police are looking into both cases, but Lt. Col. Steven O’Donnell said that evidence offered in the Alves case gave police more to go on than the sweeping allegations lobbed in the Warwick case.
“It’s hard in any election to chase leads that may or may not exist,” O’Donnell said. “We tried to go after substantiated information, rather than fishing expeditions.”
In addition to Lynch’s letter, police received several anonymous letters that laid out alleged violations that residents said occurred during the primaries, though O’Donnell would not elaborate. In recent days, troopers have visited residents at Msgr. DeAngelis Manor in West Warwick because, O’Donnell said, complaints came in that residents voted in the primary who shouldn’t have voted, and that some votes were influenced prior to the election….
Records show that at least 10 voters listed as Republicans with the West Warwick Board of Canvassers voted in the Democratic primary. The Providence Journal attempted to reach those listed and found that four of them said they’d disaffiliated in a previous primary and were listed as Republicans incorrectly. Five others could not be reached or declined to comment, and one voter, a Republican, said he was told his vote was taken out of the ballot box after he was mistakenly allowed to cast a ballot.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
15 years ago

But it gets better still.
Remember how Tavares keeps insisting there are 15 “Republicans’ who voted?
The Projo’s story last weekend laid that one to waste noting that FOUR of the “Republicans” had claimed to have disaffiliated and one went so far as to return home to find her disaffiliation form so she could vote in the Democratic Primary.
Now it comes to light that another of the 10 “Republicans” is actually listed in the WW Voter Registration list as a Democrat and a label with her name and the bar code is still in the book. So much for Tavares’ numbers and accuracy.
When is someone going to call him on this?
First Alves claimed there were 87 more ballots than ballot applications!
Wrong – In reality there are only three!
Then it was 15 alleged “Republican” votes.
Wrong – In reality only NINE! Most likely 8 and possibly only 6!
Now we have a State Police “inquiry” into a specific polling place… based upon “anonymous” letters!
I guess the election on Nov 4th will keep the State Police busy for the next few years investigating complaints received via “anonymous” letters?
Will someone please bring the Supreme Court back to reality!

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.