ProJo’s “Editorial Mystery” Solved

I posted before about the questions that Ian Donnis was asking regarding the mysterious non-publishing of an editorial by the ProJo in which they attempt to justify endorsing”Yes on 1.” (For posterity, I also included the text of the online only editorial). Now it appears as if there was no need. This morning’s (Saturday) Op-Ed page contains the piece, titled “Editorial Mysteries.” Indeed, it has been a mystery! Why did the editorial vanish? Why publish it now, so late after the election (on a Saturday, no less)? What could have possibly changed their mind? Regardless, my original problems with the piece still stand.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rhody
Rhody
14 years ago

I was amused by Howard Sutton’s “well, all the other media endorsed it” defense. The real question, which he didn’t answer, is: why the 180 regarding the casino?

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.