Anatomy of a Bifurcation

Some folks see a headline screaming “no link” and run with the statement, claiming vindication and calling for investigations into the president’s supposed war crimes. Other folks look more closely at the report (PDF) and notice such things as the abstract:

Captured Iraqi documents have uncovered evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism, including a variety of revolutionary, liberation, nationalist and Islamic terrorist organizations. While these documents do not reveal direct coordination and assistance between the Saddam regime and the al Qaeda network, they do indicate that Saddam was willing to use, albeit cautiously, operatives affiliated with al Qaeda as long as Saddam could have these terrorist-operatives monitored closely. Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some way, a “de facto” link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.

Which is pretty much the picture that many of us supporters of the war have been painting for years. Thus does America branch into not only two incompatible ideologies, but also two incompatible understandings of reality.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
16 years ago

Those who claim that this report “proves” no link between Iraq and the terrorists are merely revealing their own prejudices.
While it might be possible for captured documents to prove the existence of a link, how could such documents ever disprove such a connection? The answer is that they can’t.
It’s very much like the famous Joe Wilson trip to Niger. It is now widely claimed that his trip “proved” that Iraq was not seeking to build nukes. At best one might argue that Wilson found no evidence of such activity, but that would only prove that he didn’t find it, it couldn’t prove that no such evidence existed.
Of course, anyone who really paid attention to what Wilson really reported on his return would know that he actually did find evidence that Iraq was attempting to open up commercial dealings with Niger, and that the only thing Niger had that anyone would want to buy would be yellow cake uranium . . . Facts that the mainstream media conveniently conceals by stating that Wilson’s trip “proved” no attempts by Iraq to build nukes!

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.