On the Border of Discussion

Anybody who’s truly interested in the immigration debate should skip Charles Bakst’s typically useless column in yesterday’s Providence Journal and turn instead to the Money & Business section, in which one can read John Kostrzewa’s inquiry into the difficulties that the E-Verify mandate imposes on businesses:

To try to sort out some of the issues, I talked with Christine Cunneen, co-owner of Hire Image, a background-screening company based in Johnston.
She said that right now there are only 75 Rhode Island companies registered to use the E-Verify system.
Employers who want to use it have to sign up for a five- to six-hour online tutorial. Then the user has to pass a test showing mastery of the system. …
Using the E-Verify system also opens the employer to an audit by the Department of Homeland Security.
Cunneen said the verification process can be confusing and cumbersome.
She added, “There have been some troubles with the system.” For example, if a person gets married and the name hasn’t been changed with Social Security, the E-Verify system may not verify the eligibility of the worker.

Kostrzewa’s right that the entire debate has been conducted in an atmosphere of contentiousness and suspicion, although I’m not as quick to blame the governor; this fight’s been long and broad in its approach. Consider this interesting nugget from an Andy Smith piece on the problems that Congressional inaction on immigration (specifically with reference to temporary work visas) is creating for Rhode Island’s tourism industry (emphasis added):

In the House of Representatives, Langevin said he is also cosponsor of legislation that would allow more H-2B workers into the country. “I’ve heard a lot from the business community [in Rhode Island] and this is a major priority for them,” he said. “This is an issue that directly affects the tourism and hospitality business in Rhode Island.”
Langevin said the Hispanic Caucus would prefer the “whole package” when it comes to immigration reform, although he stopped short of saying the caucus was opposed to H-2B measures. He said the House bill, currently in the Judiciary Committee, may shortly be the subject of hearings in the immigration subcommittee.

That sounds like a little bit of the ol’ “un pueblo unido” — in this case holding up desirable, even necessary, legal immigration legislation in order to gain leverage for the only part of the larger issue that encounters real disagreement: illegal immigration. One finds it necessary to continually consider which side benefits from the conflation of the illegal with the legal, and doing so makes it increasingly clear that xenophobia is not the villain.
I’m not sure whether to find it surprising that Kostrzewa finds the following significant:

During last week’s debate, 25 Latino and Anglo business owners, bankers, buyers, managers and consultants gathered at the old Hope Club in Providence at a networking meeting of the World Affairs Council Of Rhode Island, a nonprofit group.
They shared and discussed ideas about marketing, media and how to reach customers to expand their businesses. They laughed about language mistakes when people from different cultures interact. They all left a lot smarter, with new ideas for making money.

The true contrast of this vignette with the governor’s travails isn’t so much one of facts versus no facts as it is one of joint cooperation toward a separate end versus wrangling over policy with different ends in view. When business people — any people — get together, superficialities like language recede into the scenery. When special interests and racial demagogues refuse to treat illegal immigration as a discrete issue, they make superficialities central in order to hide the important distinctions.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tim
Tim
13 years ago

Found Kostrzewa’s column full of tiresome talking points and written in the typical Rhode Island nasal whine. The ink isn’t even dry on the Executive orders and everyone is whining about the burdens being placed on them.
Enough already! God this place is embarrassing.

Ragin' Rhode Islander
Ragin' Rhode Islander
13 years ago

The only thing missing from Bakst’s piece was some Obama-like reference accusing those of us who oppose illegal immigration / amnesty of “clinging to guns and religion.”
Memo to Charlie: just because they’re in Rhode Island doesn’t mean that they’re Rhode Islanders or “one of us” – they’re trespassers here illegally, so they CAN’T be Rhode Islanders or one of us.

rhody
rhody
13 years ago

Kostrzewa an enemt of the state? He’s a business journalist. How many liberal business journalists are there, anyway?
The Providence Business News also came out against the gov’s executive order. Can’t blame Charlie Bakst for THAT.

joe bernstein
joe bernstein
13 years ago

I’d personally prefer a lot of the illegal aliens I encountered on my former job to Merrill C Bakst as a neighbor or friend.Bakst is the ultimate outsider- a mole faced nerd who probably got his lunch money taken on a regular basis.He is truly “alien” to normal Americans.

Mike
Mike
13 years ago

Bakst’s colums are usefull only as they obviate the need to purchase ipecac to induce vomiting.

Ken
Ken
13 years ago

From my perspective, one of the major documented problems with Governor Donald L. Carcieri’s executive Order 08-01 is the directive requirement to use a person’s private “federal social security number” and public law suit liability not only directly to the Governor but also to the State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island State Police, Rhode Island Department of Administration, Rhode Island Department of Motor Vehicles, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Department of Homeland Security and the local business that comply with the executive order. Also the request of Homeland Security to gain unrestricted access to the State of Rhode Island Department of Motor Vehicles records without permission as required by the Drivers Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2721 et. seq. (Public Law 103-322). Under the law, the State of Rhode Island must ask permission of the driver to release information. The unrestricted access without “individual’s permission” opens Rhode Island to law suits (watch for another check off box on DMV renewal forms.) Contrary to the State of Rhode Island executive order, the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a and the Social Security Administration restrict use of social security numbers. The Social Security Number (SSN) was created in 1936 as a nine-digit account number assigned by the Secretary of Health and Human Services for the purpose of administering the Social Security laws. SSNs were first intended for use exclusively by the federal government as a means of tracking earnings to determine the amount of Social Security taxes to credit to each worker’s account. Over time, however, SSNs were permitted to be used for purposes unrelated to the administration of the Social Security system. For example, in 1961 Congress authorized the Internal Revenue Service to use SSNs as taxpayer identification numbers. In response to growing concerns over the accumulation… Read more »

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.