Opening the Year with Fatal Steps

If you felt a dip in the collective intelligence of Rhode Island life, yesterday, it was probably because the General Assembly is back in session, gleefully lighting the fuse of 2010 with no indication that legislators intend to turn the state around. The first spark came with a veto override bonanza, including the legislation that arrogates to a union-heavy unelected board the power to define healthcare benefits for teachers across the state, mandates that districts offer that coverage (even in charters), and vomits on the principle of separation of powers.
Prudent school committees will have no option but to adjust for the control that this power grab has taken from them in the salary column, which is probably one reason that binding arbitration is so high on the union lobbyists’ list. With healthcare effectively off the table, unions will offer up impossible pay demands and look to arbitrators to split the difference in favor of slightly less impossible remuneration packages.
From the General Assembly’s press release on the override, one would never suspect that this board is much more than another investigative committee with no real power. It is more than that, and when the tally for yesterday’s vote is available, I’ll take this legislation as an opportunity to inaugurate a “legislative stooge” list of people for whom you should not vote under any circumstances. As issues in the range of “do or die” for Rhode Island come up, I’ll add to the list, as merited, and explain each inclusion.
Another spark lit the caverns of the State House when 41 of 75 members of the RI House of Representatives signed on to the following letter, penned by Rep. Amy Rice (D – Portsmouth):

Dear Governor Carcieri,
We write to you today to assert our opposition to your proposed FY2010 Supplemental Budget. Rhode Island, like almost every other state in the nation, is facing a deep fiscal deficit due to the national and global economic crisis. How we deal with the economic crisis now will determine Rhode Island’s future economic well-being. As such, we need real, honest leadership from your office as we strive to work together to fix our state’s budgetary problems.
Your supplemental budget, which you proposed without serious consultation with municipal leaders or the General Assembly, depends mostly on slashing $125 million in aid to Rhode Island’s cities and towns. Let there be no doubt about it: This drastic mid-year cut is nothing more than a passing of the buck to our municipalities. Rhode Island’s municipalities have already done so much to balance their budgets in these difficult times, including eliminating after-school programs, renegotiating collective bargaining agreements with municipal employees’ and teachers’ unions, laying off employees including police officers and firefighters, and, of course, raising property taxes – the most regressive tax.
Your claim that your proposed mid-year cuts to cities and towns will not result in raising property taxes is either cynical or an exercise in self-deception. Rhode Island already has an exceptionally upside-down tax system that results from our over-dependence on property taxes and our low rate of state support for school funding. Your Supplemental Budget proposal would severely exacerbate this imbalance by increasing our reliance on the property tax – the worst thing in this recession.
To disinvest in our communities and the public infrastructure and institutions that form the foundations of a strong economy, is not the forward-looking leadership we need. Given that the bulk of our deficit is due to decreased revenue, we must find responsible and balanced ways to raise new revenue. We need to create opportunities for success for all Rhode Islanders.
We realize that there are no easy solutions but urge you not to choose the worst option. We look forward to having you collaborate on this with the General Assembly and our municipal leaders.

From this bit of political literary theater, one would never suspect that the General Assembly has any budgetary authority at all, let alone the final determination of what the budget is. Rice’s letter perpetuates the utterly farcical spin that the General Assembly is not centrally responsible for the collapse of our state. The appropriate response from legislators to a budget with which they disagree is a better budget, not a political pronouncement to hide their collective incompetence.
Especially disappointing was to see Congressional candidate John Loughlin’s name as the sole Republican to sign on to the letter. Happily (although it took a bizarre and disconcerting email exchange to get the information), I can confirm that Loughlin was on the right side of the above-mentioned veto vote, although he did vote for the insurance board the first time around.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dan
Dan
11 years ago

An excellent idea. Check out the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance at http://www.nhliberty.org/ and their “gold standard,” which is handed out at the state house to legislators by liberty activists before every vote. It also grades and ranks every single bill and legislator by how liberty oriented they are after hours of research.
The incredible thing is that legislators and voters both actually care about stuff like that over here. Different world.

George Elbow
George Elbow
11 years ago

[Banned reader’s comment deleted. — JK]

Patrick
Patrick
11 years ago

“Rhode Island already has an exceptionally upside-down tax system that results from our over-dependence on property taxes and our low rate of state support for school funding.”
Hmm, and let’s see, exactly who can fix those problems? So, if that problem is not fixed during this legislative session, then all 41 people who signed are clearly in dereliction of their duty. There’s a major problem that they’re admitting to, and they’re the only people who can fix it. Why isn’t it getting fixed!?!

MadMom
MadMom
11 years ago

I completely agree with George Elbow that the Governor needs to expose the actions of the GA and let folks know how their elected representatives continue to vote in favor of the unions over the taxpayers. When you have a legislature which is so lopsided against you, you’ve got to be a salesman and take the message to the people. In the current economic environemnt, the taxpayers will be all ears and could rally to push for an amendment to this egregious violation of their constitutional rights. Sell, baby, sell. The people will buy.

Patrick
Patrick
11 years ago

I agree with George and MadMom, use the bully pulpit. What does the Gov have to lose now? He’s got 1 year left. He has one budget left to submit and they hack it up anyway. Burn, baby, burn.
My idea is the Gov and the state GOP or Moderates or whoever else wants to take on the Democrats start a new campaign called “It’s their fault!” Give concrete examples of problems in the state and give exact names of who caused the problem and how. Go right after the big names. Point out statements that Fox and Constantino have made. Show the “intelligence” of TPW and Connors. Go get ’em. Expose the connections that some of these legislators have. What does the state GOP have to lose? What’s going to happen, the voters elect FEWER Republicans? Is that possible? Would it matter? Start throwing the bombs, start early, drag this thing down deep in the mud and get it dirty. Expose them for all their warts. No idea why they don’t. C’mon Gio, you can do it!

michael
michael
11 years ago

They don’t because they are all in it together. Republicans, Democrats – with few exceptions it means the same thing, posturing, power grabbing polititians looking for votes.
George, the 800 pound gorilla is RITEcare, the 700 pound gorilla Special Ed. The unions might weigh in at 150.

Ragin' Rhode Islander
Ragin' Rhode Islander
11 years ago

Loughlin has turned out to be another near-RINO, if not total RINO.
First his calls for a federal bailout of the state pension system, and now this.
He lost me.
I would just sit-out that race, not vote for Patches or Loughlin for, with “Republicans” like him, who needs Democrats?
Loughlin is demonstrating that once in Congress he’ll be one of those “reach across the aisle” / “go along to get along” types who supports Democrat initiatives more than Republican ones. Just like he’s been, it appears, in the General Assembly.

Mike Cappelli
Mike Cappelli
11 years ago

Anybody notice how Auditor General Ernie Almonte is leaving to go into the private sector. Mike O’Keefe leaves as budget guy for the House, Murphy is leaving, etc.
Unless you don’t get what this is, let me explain it to you – it is the rats scurrying off a sinking ship. They are all bailing out. This state is so screwed, and they all know it, thus they are bailing.

rhody
rhody
11 years ago

I knew the RINO accusations would start to fly against Loughlin, as they would against any Republican capable of attracting Democratic votes. Circular firing squad time?
Just don’t complain if Kennedy wins again.

Ragin' Rhode Islander
Ragin' Rhode Islander
11 years ago

–“Unless you don’t get what this is, let me explain it to you – it is the rats scurrying off a sinking ship. They are all bailing out. This state is so screwed, and they all know it, thus they are bailing.”
Indeed. The rats are jumping off the ship RItanic:
http://www.anchorrising.com/images/RItanic.swf

scott
11 years ago

Amy Rice has almost lost her last 2 elections. 2006, John Robitallie lost by 4 votes! In 2008, Dan Reilly came within 200 votes as a first time candidate in the year of Obama.
Help Dan Reilly beat Amy Rice in 2010.
http://www.ElectDanReilly.org

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.