National Politics

Reflections on the Meaning of Inequality

By Donald B. Hawthorne | April 23, 2006 |

Among the weighty phrases thrown around in our public discourse, few are as provocative or poorly understood as “social justice” and “inequality.” A perspective on social justice was previously offered here. With a H/T to Cafe Hayek, David Schmidtz’s article When Inequality Matters offers a philosophical perspective on the issue of inequality. (Note: His definition…

Spending Caps Won’t Solve the Unfunded Public Sector Liability Problems Caused by the Tax-Eaters

By | April 19, 2006 |

Ed Achorn’s latest editorial A cap won’t solve R.I.’s tax troubles states: It is encouraging that Rhode Island politicians — in an election year, anyway — are awakening to the public’s agonized cries over sky-high property taxes. Senate President Joseph Montalbano (D.-North Providence), Majority Leader Teresa Paiva-Weed (D.-Newport), and Minority Leader Dennis Algiere (R.-Westerly) last…

Revisiting Why Current Lobbyist Reforms Will Fail

By Donald B. Hawthorne | April 11, 2006 |

David Boaz, the Executive Vice President of the Cato Institute, recently wrote these words about why lobbyist reform initiatives will fail: When you spread food out on a picnic table, you can expect ants. When you put $3 trillion on the table, you can expect special interests, lobbyists and pork-barrel politicians. That’s the real lesson…

The Radically Different Visions of Tax-Eaters Versus Taxpayers

By Donald B. Hawthorne | April 9, 2006 |

In an earlier posting, I introduced a book entitled The New New Left: How American Politics Works Today by Steven Malanga and a review of the book in the Claremont Review of Books. The core theme of the book was described by one reviewer as “American politics is not about [political] parties, it is about…

The Role of Government In Our Society, Revisited

By | March 5, 2006 | Comments Off on The Role of Government In Our Society, Revisited

Cafe Hayek has a very good posting entitled Government Ain’t Us, which says: The idea is prevalent that little or nothing beneficial happens for people generally unless it is done by government. Things people do individually — for their own purposes, using their own gumption, own wits, and own resources, neither incited by nor directed…

John Fund on United States of Big Labor

By | February 21, 2006 | Comments Off on John Fund on United States of Big Labor

From the February 17 edition of the Wall Street Journal’s Political Diary (available for a fee): Remember that three-day mass transit strike that paralyzed New York City over the Christmas holidays? Apparently the drama isn’t over. Since then, transit workers have narrowly rejected the contract their leadership accepted to end the strike. The union is…

The Coercive Role of Government

By | February 6, 2006 | Comments Off on The Coercive Role of Government

D. W. MacKenzie wrote in the October 2002 issue of The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, the monthly publication of the Foundation for Economic Education, about the coercive role of government: I am government… Coercion is both my vocation and my avocation; it is in my very nature to compel others to do that which they…

Move Over Senator

By Marc Comtois | February 1, 2006 |

Thinking aloud over at The Corner, Ramesh Ponnuru asks, “What do conservatives gain if Chafee wins?” But first he makes a case for conservative retribution against Sen. Chafee: The more I think about it, the more important it seems to me that Steve Laffey beat him in the Rhode Island Senate primary. None of the…

Where Senator Chafee has Gone “Off the Reservation”

By Marc Comtois | January 31, 2006 |

In addition to being the only Republican Senator to vote against the confirmation of now-Justice Alito, Senator Chafee has opposed President Bush and–more often–conservative ideals on the following substantive matters. (All links are to data provided by ProjectVoteSmart. An index of Sen. Chafee’s complete voting record is here). Presidential Appointments: Voted against nomination of Judge…

Fun Reading at the NRSC

By Marc Comtois | January 31, 2006 |

Back in December, the National Republican Senatorial Committee–in support of Sen. Chafee–decided to try to undermine Steve Laffey’s conservativism by claiming he was really a tax-and-spender. Well, by reading the comments (select “View all comments” at the aforementioned page), you’ll find that a few people have tried to set them straight. Interestingly, the thread is…