J.K. Rowling’s Stunning Lack of Imagination

Look, I think it’s largely irrelevant that J.K. Rowling thought of Albus Dumbledore — whom she outed during a lecture at Carnegie Hall — as homosexual while writing the Harry Potter books:

The question was: Did Dumbledore, who believed in the prevailing power of love, ever fall in love himself?
JKR: My truthful answer to you… I always thought of Dumbledore as gay. [ovation.] … Dumbledore fell in love with Grindelwald, and that that added to his horror when Grindelwald showed himself to be what he was. To an extent, do we say it excused Dumbledore a little more because falling in love can blind us to an extent? But, he met someone as brilliant as he was, and rather like Bellatrix he was very drawn to this brilliant person, and horribly, terribly let down by him. Yeah, that’s how i always saw Dumbledore. In fact, recently I was in a script read through for the sixth film, and they had Dumbledore saying a line to Harry early in the script saying I knew a girl once, whose hair… [laughter]. I had to write a little note in the margin and slide it along to the scriptwriter, “Dumbledore’s gay!” [laughter] “If I’d known it would make you so happy, I would have announced it years ago!”

What’s disappointing, even if she had never let the secret out, is that Rowling felt it necessary — in keeping with our monomaniacal culture — to layer homoeroticism on this key character’s formation of relationships. That she apparently couldn’t conceive of a young prodigy’s becoming enamored of a talented peer without there having to be a sexual element marks a shortcoming — and it is a shortcoming, an oversimplification, and evidence of immaturity and shallowness — that separates our society from its heritage, blocking transgenerational communication and lessons about friendship, love, and our true natures.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
16 years ago

Just like David Chase, J.K. should’ve just shut her yap and let us debate this stuff over some fine pilsner for hours on end.

16 years ago

I found this act to be extremely disappointing. The ‘outing’ of Dumbledore was completely unnecessary and reeks of pandering in addition to creating deliberate controversy by someone who is richer than the Queen herself.
The Harry Potter phenomenon was one that actually transcended the differences between the secular and religious cultures. Its popularity and positive ideals joined religious and secular people in the context of literature. I literally and figuratively brought people together. And now she found a way to create a wall (rightly or wrongly) among those whom she had previously brought together through her imaginative literature.
Extremely unfortunate and disappointing.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.