lol, I love this part (same link above)…

Although individual scientists can make mistakes, the scientific process corrects them. That’s one important way science moves forward. Climate contrarians often cherry-pick minor points like this one then inflate their importance to attack the broader science.
The rare times contrarians have proven scientists wrong, scientists have corrected the error and gone back to work. When scientists prove contrarians wrong—which happens all the time in and out of the scientific literature—contrarians tend to ignore them and move on to other points or simply repeat debunked arguments.
Because climate contrarians cannot ignore the overwhelming evidence that heat-trapping emissions from human activity are driving global warming, they have resorted to conspiracy theories and attacks on scientists to try to explain away reality. Climate contrarians likely will use this small error to try to undermine confidence in the IPCC and climate science generally. They also are using it to attack Pachauri personally. It is incumbent upon journalists to resist giving these attacks more credence than they deserve and avoid confusing the public about the real threat of global warming.

Megadittos!

The fact is,China and India won’t bend for the Copenhagen demands and won’t sign an agreement,yet the homegrown blame America crowd insists as painting their own contry the villain.
No notice of the obscene burnoffs and deforestation in Brazil,Madagascar,and Indonesia.
I suggest the people who dump on their own nest try out life in one of the aforementioned paradises-and if you’re thinking Brazil is so great,don’t live on Panema-live in a favela.
Good luck and good riddance.

[Don’t push it, bub — JK]

David-if so,why is it warming?And why should that be an excuse for corrupt third world regimes to shake down US citizens?They are polluting regularly and will not use any extorted funds to change that behavior.
As far as money to the third world,read economist Dambisa Moyo on the futiltiy of the “Bono syndrome” with regard to Africa,and she is a native of Zambia,so she’s not some out of touch theorist.
The politicization of science by BOTH sides of this dispute has made the truth inaccessible by this point in time.

You won’t see Monique commenting on this (a bit selective in her interest in climate change, no?)…
As politicians waffle on climate change, glaciers exit Glacier National Park

As Denver Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Hickenlooper waffles on climate change, the U.S. Geological Society is reporting that Montana’s Glacier National Park will be glacier-less in a decade. Scientists had previously estimated that the park’s signature glacier-grade ice fields would last until 2030.
“The 2020 date is new. Dan Fagre, glacier-melting expert [for the USGS], took a close look at his monitoring data last year and determined that the glaciers are melting faster than he had anticipated,” Steve Thompson, senior program manager at the National Park Conservation Association’s Glacier Field Office, told the Colorado Independent.
Thompson has been living and working in northern Montana for 20 years and knows Glacier and its environmental challenges intimately.
“There are only about 26 glaciers left now. There were 150 in the late 1800s,” he said.