Godwin’s Law in Paragraph Seven

Some columns are best ignored, and Tom Plate’s recent op-ed would easily have been one of those were it not for a telling little slip of the old Reductio ad Hitlerum (emphasis added):

Not even the most mature and sophisticated of columnists are immune to the temptation to occasionally hurl a shoe at someone. My own list of current targets starts off with America’s top commander in Afghanistan for shooting off his mouth in a recent speech in London. It seems Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal is against an Afghan pullback — wow, what a surprise!
Sorry, Herr General: It’s Barack Obama who has to make the difficult decision on whether to send more troops to troubled Afghanistan, or bring the boys and girls home over time. Why not let the president make his decision without such public pressure? A soft shoe for him.

Perhaps in a world in which pundits fantasize about throwing shoes as a means of disapproval it is necessary to toss some reality: General McChrystal has requested more troops because he believes it to be necessary in order to succeed in his mission and bring the theater to a condition that doesn’t entail a regular trickle of American blood. If a speech can light a fire under his inexperienced lightweight of a commander in chief, then that speech should he should give.
And, for the record, I suspect that — fantasy or reality — Tom Plate would quickly find his shoes in a much darker (less comfortable) spot, should he begin flinging them at American military officers.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike Cappelli
Mike Cappelli
11 years ago

You gotta love these liberal pukes like Plate. I’m sure he was quite delighted to see Powell criticize Bush. But that’s different to those with malleable morality.

Monique
Editor
11 years ago

Some important background. President Obama had approached General McChrystal with the goal that he (President Obama) wished to accomplish in Afghanistan and asked him for a plan to carry it out. This is the plan that President Obama is now vacillating over. So General McChrystal is being berated by lots of people, including this chucklehead, for attempting to assist President Obama with one of his foreign policy goals.
No, General McChrystal should not have publicly answered the question that effectively “leaked” the plan. That does not change certain realities, including that of time, in Afghanistan.
The merits of staying or leaving Afghanistan can be debated. The one option that should be completely off the table is to stay with an inadequate military presence. If President Obama chooses for us to stay and implements, say, the Biden Plan or some other plan instead of the McChrystal Plan, that’s what he would be doing.

Show your support for Anchor Rising with a 25-cent-per-day subscription.