This morning, I wondered out loud what the public narrative would have looked like had somebody taken action to stop the driver from plowing into a Christmas parade in Wisconsin yesterday.
Writing about Kyle Rittenhouse, David Burkhead may provide a hint of the answer:
“He shouldn’t have been there” is a stupid argument. As a free citizen in a free country on publicly accessible property he had every right to be there. As a free citizen in a free country he had every right to be armed for his own protection. As a free citizen in a free country he had every right to move to stop an incipient disaster (a burning dumpster on its way–never mind how for the moment–to a gas station where it might well set off a conflagration that could kill hundreds).
Burkhead goes on to detail that a burning dumpster when combined with a gas station could have resulted in many more deaths, and certainly much more destruction that night. It appears that Rittenhouse stopped that. Unfortunately, in this life we’re not always able to take credit for the bad things that would have happened had we not intervened.
[Open full post]
Bob Walsh, the head of the National Education Association of Rhode Island teachers union, perfectly illustrates the problem with so much insider thinking in the Ocean State with this comment:
Perspective: If you supported the extra $600 per week that unemployed workers received during the pandemic but are critical of a $3000 stipend (less than $40/week) for those who spent the last 80 weeks working during the pandemic you need to think hard about your values.
The government stepped in to help people who were thrown out of work, often because the government forbade their employers from opening. Walsh thinks that entitles government employees who were never forced to stop working and who may even have had an easier time at work, inasmuch as their offices closed down at times without stopping the paychecks, they were able to work from home, and/or their clients’ access to their offices was severely restricted.
So, government workers are insulated from the effects of economic challenges, and still they want an added “equity” benefit mirroring help that was offered to those who suffered.
[Open full post]
Unfortunately, it’s a familiar sequence.
A video hits social media showing a few seconds of some shocking incident. At first it is universally passed along with expressions of horror, but very quickly, browsing users can begin to see most posts groping for political relevance.
Facts begin to emerge, and if they serve a progressive narrative (anti-racism, anti-gun, anti-Israel, anti-pro-life, anti-Republican, et cetera), the news media amplifies the story to make it a national, or international, scandal. If the facts are ambiguous, the clip will circulate for another day or so for its shock value. And if the facts undermine a progressive narrative, the story will actively be downplayed and vanish quickly.
Last night, a red SUV plowed through a crowd of people marching in the street in Waukesha, Wisconsin. (The multiple videos are easy to find.) The first detail that complicated any of the predictable narratives was that it wasn’t a protest, but a Christmas parade. Now that police have taken a man into custody, and he’s black, the likelihood is that this story will fall somewhere between the “ambiguous politics” path and the “undermines progressive” path.
The video is just so shocking that it has some monetary value to the news media, and if the detained man turns out to be the culprit, he doesn’t thoroughly stain progressives, so there’s no downside from collecting those eyeballs.
Heavy.com has proven reliable with the information it quickly provides in these cases, and the picture its coverage paints is of a generally thuggish criminal. More information is needed, but early indications are that he was fleeing the scene of some sort of knife attack, and the parade got in his way. Unsurprisingly, his social media accounts swim in the “anti-racist” waters, but he probably wasn’t motivated by politics; progressivism is more of a fashionable outfit people put on.
The shame of it all is that we prevent ourselves from sharing in each others’ grief, as well as shaping our understanding of what’s going wrong in a healthy way, by filtering everything through a narrow lens. Moreover, because the narratives are so predictable and, at this point, so powerful as to end lives and cause riots, they affect our decisions.
Imagine, for example, a police officer or armed citizen had had the opportunity to take this guy out just before he accelerated into the parade. What do you think the social media posts of politicians, activists, and journalists would have said about that?
Pause to think about it for even a moment, and the truck has already maimed or killed dozens of people.
[Open full post]
Mental Health Issues and Concerns 11-8-21 from John Carlevale on Vimeo.
J. Clement “Bud” Cicilline, former CEO of Newport County Mental Health Center, joins host Darlene D’Arezzo to discuss major issues and concerns facing mental health practice today. With many years of experience, he walks us through the history of mental health services in Rhode Island and talks about what is needed to improve services and meet the growing need for mental health services.
[Open full post]
It adds up, of course, but when government is trillions of dollars in debt, a hundred million here and there seems hardly to count. That may be part of the reason that news of grants like the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Hiring Program doesn’t typically question where the money will come from. The tone is always one of opportunity and community building:
Five Rhode Island communities were awarded funding totaling $750,000.
“We are committed to providing police departments with the resources needed to help ensure community safety and build community trust,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said. “The grants we are announcing today will enable law enforcement agencies across the country to hire more than 1,000 additional officers to support vitally important community oriented policing programs.”
So, we learn that North Providence, Richmond, Scituate, and Smithfield will each receive $125,000 to hire one officer each, while Tiverton will receive $250,000 for two. We get a little bit of a sense of what initiatives will be the focus of new hires. Half of all recipients will work on “building legitimacy and trust” in their communities. One third will try to address “high rates of gun violence” or “other areas of violence.” The remainder will turn their attention either to responding to “persons in crisis” or (Warning! Warning!) “combating hate and domestic extremism.”
Conspicuously, the less PR-friendly aspects of the awards are not mentioned. The Department of Justice will pay up to 75% of the cost for new hires for three years, for a maximum total of $125,000 each. The town has to pay the rest. In Tiverton, the cost of an entry-level officer is around $75,000, for a three-year total of roughly $225,000. That means the cost of these awards to the communities will be something like $100,000 over three years, except for Tiverton, which will have to come up with $200,000 it otherwise wouldn’t have spent.
When the three years are up, the municipalities have to cover at least another year, bringing the cost of the grant closer to $200,000 per officer hired. However, the likelihood that a town would actually decide to reduce the force because the grant is over is next to zero. The real cost is therefore an additional employee (plus pension) forever.
Maybe it’s still worth doing, and maybe it’s not, but shouldn’t these details be part of the public discussion? And should the feds really be using tax dollars lent to us by future generations to manipulate current taxpayers in local governments’ hiring decisions?
Featured image by Bermix Studio on Unsplash.
[Open full post]
“Am I the only one who quit singing along,
Every time they play a Springsteen song.”
Hat tip Lara Logan.
[Open full post]
Something about the way Ted Nesi puts this question about possible hospital mergers in Rhode Island strikes me as odd:
Will Rhode Island and its residents be better off with roughly 80% of hospital services controlled by a single powerful entity?
One wonders how many of the people who fear that “an institution so large would be effectively uncontrollable” are just fine with a single powerful entity having nearly 100% control over healthcare, provided we call it a government?
[Open full post]
Competition is stiff for the most revealingly shocking social media commentary from public figures in Rhode Island and its surrounding environs. Travis Andersen captured a bunch for the Boston Globe, including this frontrunner from U.S. Democrat Congressman David Cicilline:
Bringing a gun to a peaceful protest and chasing people down is not self defense. This acquittal is a stain on our justice system.
This is a plain lie, and the congressman must know it, meaning it’s simple, disgusting demagoguery meant to stoke resentment and division, which is likely to lead to violence.
Also in the running has to be this straight-up racism from Democrat state senator Tiara Mack:
My standards for white people was always high AND it just got higher. If you aren’t actively confronting how you uphold white supremacist systems I don’t have time for you.
Of particular importance, here, is how revealing the statement is not only of Mack (from whom such racism is to be expected), but of Rhode Island’s entire political and media establishment. Nobody in the mainstream will challenge her on this… or even politely ask if it might not be exactly appropriate for an elected official to be so obviously racist. They’re either scared, in agreement, or too interested in maintaining political hegemony.
The most-shocking tweet, however, is probably the one shown in the featured image of this post. It’s from the non-profit organization Rhode Island Kids Count:
When we talk about structural racism & white privilege— here’s an example below.
How often have *assumptions* about Black boys and Black men resulted in death?—and yet, #KyleRittenhouse was not guilty on all charges.
This is what white supremacy looks like. This is not justice.
The “example” is a graphic created by the progressive propaganda organization Path to Progress drawing a direct comparison between the heart-breaking shooting of Tamir Rice, seven years ago, and Kyle Rittenhouse. The two cases have almost nothing in common, except that they involved boys and shootings, and putting them side-by-side serves no purpose but to stir people up and push them toward action, which the past decade proves often turns violent.
Plenty of more-relevant comparisons could be made. In April, a Maryland police officer shot 16-year-old Peyton Ham, a white boy, who was carrying the same sort of gun Tamir Rice had. The CNN story at that link leads to similar stories involving whites, blacks, Hispanics, boys, girls. Children. According to a 2016 Washington Post report, during two years, 86 people were “shot while carrying fake guns” in America. Most were male. More than half were white. Four were under 18. It’s horrible, but in a country of over 300 million people, it happens.
What’s particularly shocking about the RI Kids Count tweet, though, isn’t the comparison. It’s that an organization like RI Kids Count would consider this appropriate use of its official Twitter account. It’s a respected organization whose mission is to provide reliable information about children in the Ocean State to help citizens and officials make better decisions on their behalf… at least that was its mission as recently as April:
The mission of Rhode Island KIDS COUNT is to improve the health, safety, education, economic well-being, and development of Rhode Island’s children.
According to the organization’s own most-recent factbook, it’s still the case that 71% of Rhode Island’s children are white (with some portion of that number are Hispanic). Yet, at some point since April, RI Kids Count changed its mission statement as follows:
The mission of Rhode Island KIDS COUNT is to improve the health, safety, education, economic well-being, and development of Rhode Island’s children with a commitment to equity and the elimination of unacceptable disparities by race, ethnicity, disability, zip code, immigration status, neighborhood, and income.
Rhode Island KIDS COUNT engages in information-based advocacy to achieve equitable public policies and programs for the improvement of children’s lives.
Apparently, the “anti-racism” wave means organizations can no longer simply advocate for children as children. Missions have to be changed to advance the radical cause of equity, even if that means spreading dishonest propaganda to stoke division, which can be relied upon to harm children most, particularly disadvantaged children of all races.
[Open full post]
As winter nears here in the Northeast, it sure is nice to know that part of the just-passed-the-House “Build Back Better” plan is a tax increase on natural gas. As Eric Boehm of Reason reports:
Buried inside the “Build Back Better” plan that cleared the House of Representatives on Friday morning is a new tax on natural gas production that will likely translate into higher heating bills for American households.
The new tax is aimed at curbing methane emissions and will apply fees to companies that produce, process, transmit or store oil and natural gas starting in 2023. The specific fees will depend on where the natural gas is produced and will vary depending on how much methane is released into the atmosphere during the process. Overall, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the new “methane fee” will generate about $8 billion over the next 10 years.
The natural gas industry says that money will end up coming directly out of consumers’ wallets.
This must have been the brainchild of some west coast environmentalist who doesn’t have to worry about cold winters. Or not.
The proposed methane fee is based on legislation introduced earlier this year by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D–R.I.). In a statement when the bill was introduced, Whitehouse said the new fees would slow climate change and improve air quality.
And make his own constituents pay more.
[Open full post]
In the course of my inquiries about the Equity Institute’s activities in the Portsmouth school system, I received this statement from Superintendent Thomas Kenworthy:
The Portsmouth School Department contracted with the Equity Institute last spring to conduct a third-party analysis that we can use to inform our work around equity. We have a Strategic Plan goal connected to ensuring equitable opportunities for all students and were at the point last year where we felt we needed this type of third-party review to inform our work. The report we receive will be reviewed and we as a district will determine what steps we take from there. There are very few organizations that could do this analysis and meet all of the guidelines we would insist on around transparency and a vetted methodology. The Equity Institute came highly recommended by several local districts that had worked with them. We have a signed agreement, reviewed and approved by our school department attorney, that safeguards student privacy and ensures that all state and federal guidelines applicable to conducting student surveys will be followed. Student survey questions were reviewed over the course of three community forum sessions. The Equity Institute took that community feedback into account before finalizing the questions being used for our Portsmouth analysis. Parents have been given the opportunity to both request to preview student survey questions and opt their child out of taking the survey.
I had asked whether (1) he thought it appropriate that the public could not review the surveys, whether (2) the aggressive secrecy of the Equity Institute concerned him, and whether (3) he thought bringing up notions of “gender non-conformance” with children as young as eight is appropriate. His answer, shown above, is essentially, “We want this as a school department and followed all the appropriate processes.”
Kenworthy’s response provides an important reminder for those of us who find this Balkanizing, racist trend in elementary and secondary schools disturbing. They really do think they’re doing important work and that we only object because of our unsavory biases. We will get no concessions, and they aren’t going to stop.
If you want it to stop, you are going to have to remove them from office, from the bottom to the top. That won’t be easy, and many families would be better off putting their money where their beliefs are and exiting the system.
The Portsmouth school system is down 192 students since the 2018-2019 school year. That’s 8%. Since its enrollment peak within the window of the state’s online data, during the 2003-2004 school year, enrollment is down 27% — more than one-quarter of all students, gone.
The district’s budget has not gone down, however. The earliest audit available on the town’s website is for the 2007-2008 school year, when the total school unrestricted expenditures totaled $33,451,958 (pg. 54). The most recent available audit is for 2019-2020, and it reports that numbers as $39,580,635. This 18% increase in spending combines with the decrease in enrollment over the same period for an increase in per-student spending of 44%! Would anybody claim this has corresponded with an increase in student results?
These are not the public schools in which we were educated. They’re not even the public schools they were five or 10 years ago. For the sake of our communities, we have to save them, but families should look to their own children first.
Featured image by Vahid Moeini Jazani on Unsplash.
[Open full post]